Environmental and innovation policies for the evolution of green technologies: a survey and a test

被引：56
作者：
Crespi F. [1 ,4 ]
Ghisetti C. [2 ]
Quatraro F. [3 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Economics, Roma Tre University, Rome
[2] Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, Ferrara
[3] Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis, University of Torino, Lungo Dora Siena 100 A, Turin
[4] BRICK, Collegio Carlo Alberto, Moncalieri
来源：
Eurasian Business Review | 2015年 / 5卷 / 2期
基金：
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词：
Environmental policy; Innovation; green technologies; Survey; Technology policy;
D O I：
10.1007/s40821-015-0027-z
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The aim of this paper is to provide an updated survey of the “state of the art” in environmental policies, with a particular focus on those policies fostering the generation, diffusion and exploitation of technologies improving environmental performances, i.e. eco-innovations. In particular, we provide a critical appraisal of the existing policy schemes, by emphasizing how the demarcation between environmental and technology policies gets more and more blurred. The case for a systemic approach to the implementation of policy measures is finally discussed. Econometric evidence about the importance of environmental policies is also provided in the “Appendix”. © 2015, Eurasia Business and Economics Society.
引用
收藏
页码：343 / 370
页数：27
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Alt J., Preston I., Sibieta L., The political economy of tax policy, Dimensions of tax design: The mirrlees review, pp. 1204-1279, (2010)
[2]  
Ambec S., Cohen M.A., Elgie S., Lanoie P., The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness?, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 16, (2013)
[3]  
Antonelli C., Crespi F., The Matthew effect in R&D public subsidies: The case of Italy, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, pp. 1523-1534, (2013)
[4]  
Arrow K., Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, Universities-National Bureau (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, pp. 609-626, (1962)
[5]  
Beise M., Rennings K., Lead markets and regulation: A framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations, Ecological Economics, 52, pp. 5-17, (2005)
[6]  
Berman E., Bui L.T.M., Environmental Regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 3, pp. 498-510, (2001)
[7]  
Binswanger M., Technological progress and sustainable development: What about the rebound effect?, Ecological Economics, 36, 1, pp. 119-132, (2001)
[8]  
Bloom N., Griffith R., Van Reenen J., Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997, Journal of Public Economics, 85, 1, pp. 1-31, (2002)
[9]  
Bohringer C., Loschel A., Moslener U., Rutherford T.F., EU climate policy up to 2020: An economic impact assessment, Energy Economics, 31, pp. S295-S305, (2009)
[10]  
Borghesi S., Cainelli G., Mazzanti M., European emission trading scheme and environmental innovation: An empirical analysis using CIS data for Italy, Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 71, 1, pp. 71-97, (2012)
12345678910