Phylogenetic study of Japanese Dickeya spp. and development of new rapid identification methods using PCR–RFLP

被引:0
作者
Radix Suharjo
Hiroyuki Sawada
Yuichi Takikawa
机构
[1] Shizuoka University,Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Graduate School of Science and Technology
[2] University of Lampung,Faculty of Agriculture
[3] National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences,undefined
来源
Journal of General Plant Pathology | 2014年 / 80卷
关键词
Biochemical assays; strains; Genomic fingerprinting; MLSA (multilocus sequence analysis); PCR–RFLP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forty-one representative Japanese Dickeya spp. (Erwinia chrysanthemi) strains isolated from 24 plants in Japan were investigated using multilocus sequence analysis of recA, dnaX, rpoD, gyrB and 16S rDNA; PCR–RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) of recA, rpoD and gyrB genes; PCR genomic fingerprinting; and biochemical tests. Based on the recA, dnaX, rpoD, gyrB and 16S rDNA sequences and PCR genomic fingerprinting, the strains were essentially divided into six groups (I–VI). Group I corresponded to D. chrysanthemi, group II corresponded to D. dadantii, group III to D. dianthicola and group IV to D. zeae. Meanwhile, group V and group VI could not be assigned to any existing Dickeya species, and they were deduced to be two putative new species. The PCR–RFLP analysis of gyrB, rpoD and recA clearly differentiated the six groups of Dickeya strains. From the results of the biochemical tests, the strains were assigned to biovars 1, 3, 5, 8 and 9; only one strain (SUPP 2525) was not assignable to the existing biovars. We also showed that the PCR–RFLP analysis of rpoD, gyrB and recA can be used as a rapid technique to identify Japanese Dickeya strains.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 254
页数:17
相关论文
共 244 条
[1]  
Brady CL(2012)Proposal to reclassify Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62 1592-1602
[2]  
Cleenwerck I(1992) (Hildebrand and Schroth 1967) Hauben et al. 1999 into a new genus, J Appl Bacteriol 73 99-107
[3]  
Denman S(1979) gen. nov., as Phytopathology 69 324-329
[4]  
Venter SN(1980) comb. nov., description of Int J Syst Bacteriol 30 129-134
[5]  
Rodríguez-Palenzuela P(2004) subsp. J Appl Microbiol 96 535-545
[6]  
Coutinho TA(1968) comb. nov., New Zeal J Sci 11 590-607
[7]  
Vos PD(1969) subsp. New Zeal J Sci 12 81-97
[8]  
Cother EJ(1969) subsp. nov and New Zeal J Sci 12 223-236
[9]  
Bradley JK(1969) subsp. New Zeal J Sci 12 833-839
[10]  
Gillings MR(2010) subsp. nov., emendation of the description of the genus Proc Kanto-Tosan Plant Prot Soc 57 41-43