Innovation driver and county air pollution: cost-benefit analysis perspective

被引:0
作者
Rongbo Zhang
Changbiao Zhong
机构
[1] Qingdao University of Technology,Business School
[2] Shanghai University,School of Economics
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2024年 / 31卷
关键词
Innovation driver; County innovation; Air pollution; Mechanism path; Cost and benefit analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Innovation is the first power to drive the county’s green and low-carbon. It is crucial to explore the impact of innovation on air pollution from the perspective of counties at the bottom of the administrative division hierarchy. The article is aimed at exploring the direct impact effects, spatial spillover effects, impact mechanism pathways, non-linear relationships, and cost-benefits of innovation drive on air pollution in counties. To this end, based on the collection of county-level data from 2007 to 2020 in mainland China, the article constructs a fixed-effects model, a dynamic panel model, and a spatial Durbin model for analysis. For every 1% increase in the quantity of innovation, the county SO2 emission concentration decreases by 0.2% on average; for every 1% increase in the quality of innovation, the county SO2 emission concentration decreases by 0.3% on average. When the county innovation quantity driver increases by one standard deviation, the county SO2 concentration decreases by an average of 0.29%; when the county innovation quality driver each standard deviation increases, the county SO2 concentration is reduced by 0.33% on average. The significant entry of high-end factors, the increased frequency of regulation by the environmental protection department, and the increasing efficiency of energy use are the important mechanism pathways for innovation-driven reduction of air pollution in counties. There is no significant “(inverted) U-shaped” relationship between innovation-driven air pollution in the county samples. There is a negative spatial spillover effect of the innovation quality drive on air pollution control in all Chinese county samples. Innovation to drive the declining size of the county’s sulfur dioxide can bring about one billion yuan (about 139.81 million U.S. dollars) in comprehensive economic benefits. In the coming period, county governments should build a new pattern of “blue sky and white clouds” with neighboring regions in terms of spatial agglomeration of high-end elements, green transformation and utilization of energy, and intelligent monitoring and supervision of pollution.
引用
收藏
页码:10621 / 10634
页数:13
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]  
Abbas S(2022)The effect of renewable energy development, market regulation, and environmental innovation on CO Environ Sci Pollut Res 29 59483-59501
[2]  
Gui P(2020) emissions in BRICS countries Environ Ecol Stat 27 203-232
[3]  
Chen A(2021)Innovation, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the energy–pollution–growth nexus in OECD region: a simultaneous equation modeling approach Pol J Environ Stud 30 4401-4403
[4]  
Ahmad M(2023)Assessing the environmental impacts of COVID-19; a review PloS One 18 e0282498-424
[5]  
Khattak SI(2022)Does FDI foster technological innovations? Empirical evidence from BRICS economies Sustainability 14 2181-15038
[6]  
Khan A(2002)FDI, green innovation and environmental quality nexus: new insights from BRICS economies Energy Policy 30 409-492
[7]  
Ali N(2022)The potential contribution of renewable energy in air pollution abatement in China and India Technol Forecast Soc Change 177 121521-62
[8]  
Hu X(2023)The impact of technological innovation on air pollution: firm-level evidence from China Energy Policy 172 113338-21131
[9]  
Hussain J(2019)Green technology innovation and CO Environ Pollut 254 113012-24076
[10]  
Ali N(2019) emission in China: evidence from a spatial-temporal analysis and a nonlinear spatial Durbin model Environ Sci Pollut Res 26 15028-21