Bacterial adhesion to composite resins produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing

被引:0
作者
Nazire Esra Ozer
Zeynep Sahin
Cansu Yikici
Serhat Duyan
Mehmet Ali Kilicarslan
机构
[1] Lokman Hekim University,Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry
[2] Lokman Hekim University,Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry
[3] University of Health Sciences,Department of Medical Microbiology, Department of Microbiology
[4] Gülhane Training and Research Hospital,Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry
[5] Ankara University,undefined
来源
Odontology | 2024年 / 112卷
关键词
Composite Resins; 3D printing; CAD/CAM milling; Surface roughness; Bacterial adhesion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness and contact angle of composite resins produced by CAD/CAM milling and three-dimensional (3D) printing for permanent restorations as well as the adhesion of S. mutans and S. sanguinis bacteria to these composites. Three CAD/CAM milling composite resins (Vita Enamic-VE, Cerasmart-CE, Lava Ultimate-LU) and three 3D printing resins (Varseo Smile Crown plus-VSC, Saremco print Crowntech-SPC, Formlabs 3B Permanent crown-FLP) were selected. Twenty samples were prepared for each group. Using a contact profilometer, the surface roughness was determined, and an optical goniometer was used to quantify the contact angle. To evaluate the bacterial adhesion, composite specimens were immersed in mucin containing artificial saliva. All samples were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. CFUs were determined by counting colonies after the incubation period. Surface roughness values of test samples were the highest in the Group VSC [0.46 (0.14) µm], whereas the lowest values were found in the Group LU [0.23 (0.05) µm]. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in contact angle values (p > 0.05). The S. mutans adhesion extent on the Group SPC was statistically higher compared to all other materials with p < 0.05. For S. sanguinis, the lowest bacterial adhesion value was recorded in Group CE (3.00 × 104 CFU/ml) and statistically significant differences were found with Group VE and VSC (p < 0.05). Different digital manufacturing techniques and material compositions can affect the surface roughnesses of composite resins. All composite resin samples have hydrophobic characteristics. Microbial adhesion of the tested composite resins may be varied depending on the bacterial species. S. mutans showed much more adhesion to these materials than S. sanguinis.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 471
页数:11
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Miyazaki T(2009)A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience Dent Mater J 28 44-56
[2]  
Methani MM(2020)The potential of additive manufacturing technologies and their processing parameters for the fabrication of all-ceramic crowns: a review J Esthet Restor Dent 32 182-192
[3]  
Revilla-León M(2021)3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry: an overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing J Clin Med 10 2010-370
[4]  
Zandinejad A(2021)Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis J Prosthodont Res 65 365-172
[5]  
Schweiger J(2022)Comparison of material properties and biofilm formation in interim single crowns obtained by 3D printing and conventional methods J Prosthet Dent 127 168-815
[6]  
Edelhoff D(2022)3D-printed resins for provisional dental restorations: comparison of mechanical and biological properties J Esthet Restor Dent 34 804-2784
[7]  
Güth J-F(2019)Fracture load of CAD/CAM-fabricated and 3D-printed composite crowns as a function of material thickness Clin Oral Invest 23 2777-285
[8]  
Emir F(2021)Printable and machinable dental restorative composites for CAD/CAM application—comparison of mechanical properties, fractographic, texture and fractal dimension analysis Materials 14 4919-131
[9]  
Ayyildiz S(2023)Mechanical characteristics of composite resins produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 31 278-1825
[10]  
Simoneti DM(2023)Physical and mechanical properties of four 3D-printed resins at two different thick layers: an in vitro comparative study Dent Mat 67 121-417