Simultaneous quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in GMPEs using Gaussian process regression

被引:0
作者
Marcel Hermkes
Nicolas M. Kuehn
Carsten Riggelsen
机构
[1] University of Potsdam,Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences
[2] University of California,Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center Organization
来源
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering | 2014年 / 12卷
关键词
Gaussian Process regression; Epistemic uncertainty; Aleatory variability; Empirical ground–motion models; Bayesian non–parametrics; GMPE; Generalization error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a Bayesian non-parametric method based on Gaussian Process (GP) regression to derive ground-motion models for peak-ground parameters and response spectral ordinates. Due to its non-parametric nature there is no need to specify any fixed functional form as in parametric regression models. A GP defines a distribution over functions, which implicitly expresses the uncertainty over the underlying data generating process. An advantage of GP regression is that it is possible to capture the whole uncertainty involved in ground-motion modeling, both in terms of aleatory variability as well as epistemic uncertainty associated with the underlying functional form and data coverage. The distribution over functions is updated in a Bayesian way by computing the posterior distribution of the GP after observing ground-motion data, which in turn can be used to make predictions. The proposed GP regression models is evaluated on a subset of the RESORCE data base for the SIGMA project. The experiments show that GP models have a better generalization error than a simple parametric regression model. A visual assessment of different scenarios demonstrates that the inferred GP models are physically plausible.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 466
页数:17
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Abrahamson NA(1992)A stable algorithm for regression analysis using the random effects model Bull Seismol Soc Am 82 505-510
[2]  
Youngs RR(2008)Comparisons of the NGA ground-motion relations Earthq Spectra 24 45-66
[3]  
Abrahamson N(2010)Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East Seismol Res Lett 81 195-206
[4]  
Atkinson G(2010)The variability of ground-motion prediction models and its components Seismol Res Lett 81 794-801
[5]  
Boore D(1994)Nonparametric description of peak acceleration as a function of magnitude, distance, and site in Guerrero, Mexico Bull Seismol Soc Am 84 1003-1017
[6]  
Bozorgnia Y(2010)Multivariate Bayesian regression analysis applied to ground-motion prediction equations, part 1: theory and synthetic example Bull Seismol Soc Am 100 1551-1567
[7]  
Campbell K(2010)Multivariate Bayesian regression analysis applied to ground-motion prediction equations, part 2: numerical example with actual data Bull Seismol Soc Am 100 1568-1577
[8]  
Chiou B(2011)On the forecasting of ground-motion parameters for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis Earthq Spectra 27 1-1735
[9]  
Silva W(2012)Challenges of building logic trees for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis Earthq Spectra 28 1723-1977
[10]  
Idriss IM(2006)Why do modern probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses often lead to increased hazard estimates? Bull Seismol Soc Am 96 1967-389