Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies

被引:0
作者
Yasaman Vali
Mariska M. G. Leeflang
Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam,Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC
来源
Systematic Reviews | / 10卷
关键词
Risk-of-bias assessment; Quality appraisal; Diagnostic accuracy studies; Systematic reviews;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]  
Burns PB(2011)The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine Plast Reconstr Surg 128 305-310
[2]  
Rohrich RJ(2017)Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality Syst Rev 6 1-14
[3]  
Chung KC(2003)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 3 25-392
[4]  
Pussegoda K(2007)The Cochrane Collaboration and systematic reviews Br J Surg 94 391-536
[5]  
Turner L(2011)QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies Ann Intern Med 155 529-897
[6]  
Garritty C(2008)Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy Ann Intern Med 149 889-13
[7]  
Mayhew A(2014)Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study BMC Med Res Methodol 14 33-180
[8]  
Skidmore B(2017)The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence J Clin Epidemiol 87 4-73
[9]  
Stevens A(2019)RoB 2: A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials BMJ. 366 l48981-220
[10]  
Whiting P(2016)Comparison of two meta-analysis methods: inverse-variance-weighted average and weighted sum of Z-scores Genom Inform 14 173-893