Laboratory and field evaluation of fungicides for the management of sugarcane smut caused by Sporisorium scitamineum in seedcane

被引:0
作者
Shamsul A. Bhuiyan
Barry J. Croft
Rebecca S. James
Mike C. Cox
机构
[1] BSES Limted,
[2] BSES Limited,undefined
[3] Australian Quarantine and Inspection Services (AQIS),undefined
来源
Australasian Plant Pathology | 2012年 / 41卷
关键词
Triazole fungicides; Azoxystrobin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sugarcane smut caused by Sporisorium scitamineum is one of the most devastating diseases of sugarcane. Two trialzole fungicides, propiconazole and triadimefon, have been used to protect seedcane from infection with sugarcane smut elsewhere, particularly after hot water treatment. These fungicides were registered under an emergency permit in Australia when smut was found for the first time in Queensland in 2006. A research program was initiated to screen and evaluate a range of fungicides against sugarcane smut. Nine fungicides were tested in vitro at various concentrations for their efficacy on smut spore germination. Azoxystrobin (Amistar®), quintozene (Quintozene® 750) and didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (Steri-max®) completely stopped germination of teliospores at 2.5 mg a.i./L. Propiconazole (Tilt®), triadimefon (Bayleton®), cyproconazole (Alto®) and acibenzolar-s-methyl (Bion®) significantly (P < 0.05) reduced spore germination at 50, 100 and 200 mg a.i./L. Two field trials were planted in spring 2008 and autumn 2009, where cane setts that had been inoculated with smut were dipped in a range of fungicide suspensions for five or 10 min, prior to planting. Cyproconazole, propiconazole, triadimefon and azoxystrobin significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed disease expression for up to 6 months in a summer experiment and 9 months in an autumn experiment. These results have important implication for selecting new fungicides for the control of sugarcane smut in seedcane that is provided to Australian sugarcane growers as a disease-free propagation source.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 599
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Bailey RA(1979)Possibilities for the control of sugarcane smut (Ustilago scitaminea) with fungicides Proc S Afr Sugar Technol Assoc 53 137-142
  • [2] Bailey R(1980)Possibilities for the control of sugarcane smut ( South African Sugar J 1980 158-164
  • [3] Bharathi V(2009)) with fungicides Int J Plant Prot 2 151-153
  • [4] Bhuiyan SA(2010)Chemical control of sugarcane smut through sett treatment with fungicides Proc Aust Soc Sugar Technol 32 355-365
  • [5] Croft BJ(1964)Varietal resistance of sugarcane to natural infection of smut–preliminary results Trans Br Mycol Soc 47 403-407
  • [6] Cox MC(1983)Studies on sugarcane smut ( Plant Dis 67 452-457
  • [7] Bade G(2006)) in Keny Australas Plant Pathol 35 113-122
  • [8] Bock KR(2008)Hawaii’s approach to control of sugarcane smut Australas Plant Pathol 37 26-34
  • [9] Comstock JC(2008)Management of an incursion of sugarcane smut in Australia Proc Aust Soc Sugar Technol 30 125-134
  • [10] Ferreira SA(2009)Sugarcane smut in Queensland: arrival and emergency response Plant Dis 93 1171-1174