Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Retrospective Study of 1198 Cases to Assess Indications for Surgical Removal, and Correlation with Age, Sex and Type of Impaction—A Single Institutional Experience

被引:18
作者
Patel S. [1 ]
Mansuri S. [2 ]
Shaikh F. [2 ]
Shah T. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, AMC-MET Dental College and Hospital, J-501, Sumadhur-2 Apartment, Behind Azad Society, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad, 380015, Gujarat
[2] Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, AMC-MET Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad
[3] University of North Texas School of Public Health, Denton, TX
关键词
Impaction; IMTM (impacted mandibular third molar); Indication; Retrospective; SRIMTM (surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar);
D O I
10.1007/s12663-016-0929-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: To study the incidence of mandibular third molar impaction in relation to type and side of impaction, age and sex of patients and indications for its surgical removal through data collected from a single institute over a period of 3 and half years. Methods: The records of 1198 patients who underwent the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars were reviewed retrospectively. Records were divided into groups according to sex, age, type and side of impaction. Radiographs were studied to determine angular position of impacted mandible third molar. Results: We found that there was a high incidence of mesioangular lower third molar impaction (33.97 %), highest number of patients were found in 15–30 years of age group (48.33 %), a left side (56.93 %) was more commonly involved, female predominance (63.44 %) was observed and recurrent pericoronitis (33.81 %) was the most common indication. Conclusion: Awareness of the indications for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar to the patients will help to avoid future risk of complications and morbidity associated with the same. This will not only help in saving time and money but also prevents the psychological trauma associated with delayed treatment. Removal of only symptomatic IMTM seems to be the logical choice in view of financial constraint in developing countries like India but at the same time early removal offers freedom from future complications in selected cases. So surgeons should apply a meticulous approach in selecting the patients for SRIMTM. © 2016, The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 84
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
James R.H., Edward E., Myron R.T., Principles of management of impacted teeth. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery, 6, pp. 143-167, (2008)
[2]  
Venu Gopal Reddy K., Distribution of third molar impaction among rural and urban dwellers in the age group of 22–30 years in South India: a comparative study, J. Maxillofac Oral Surg, 11, 3, pp. 271-275, (2012)
[3]  
Kaveri G.S., Prakash S., Third molar: a threat to periodontal health??, J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 11, 2, pp. 220-223, (2012)
[4]  
van der Linden W., Cleanton-Jones P., Lownie M., Disease and lesions associated with third molar: review of 1001 cases, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 79, pp. 142-145, (1995)
[5]  
Liedholm R., Knutsson K., Lysell L., Rohlin M., Mandibular third molar: oral surgeon’s assessment of the indications for removal, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 37, pp. 440-443, (1999)
[6]  
Olasoji H.O., Odusanya S.A., Comparative study of third molar impaction in rural and urban areas of south western Nigeria, J Odontostomatol Trop, 23, 90, pp. 25-28, (2000)
[7]  
Al-Khateeb T.H., Bataineh A.B., Pathology associated with impacted mandibular third molar in group of Jordanians, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 64, pp. 1598-1602, (2006)
[8]  
Babu H.S.C., Reddy P.B., Pattathan R.K.B., Desai R., Shubha A.B., Factors influencing lingual nerve paraesthesia following third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study, J. Maxillofac Oral Surg, 12, 2, pp. 168-172, (2013)
[9]  
Consensus development conference for removal of third molar, J Oral Surg, 38, pp. 235-236, (1980)
[10]  
Kandasamy S., Rinchuse D.J., The wisdom behind third molar extractions, Aust Dent J, 54, pp. 284-292, (2009)