Spatial targeting evaluation of energy and environmental performance of waste-to-energy processing

被引:0
作者
Petar S. Varbanov
Timothy G. Walmsley
Yee V. Fan
Jiří J. Klemeš
Simon J. Perry
机构
[1] Brno University of Technology,Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
[2] The University of Manchester,Centre for Process Integration, School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science
来源
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering | 2018年 / 12卷
关键词
waste-to-energy; supply chain optimisation; GHG savings; energy recovery ratio;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Waste-to-energy supply chains are important potential contributors to minimising the environmental impacts of municipal solid waste by reducing the amounts of waste sent to landfill, as well as the fossil fuel consumption and environmental footprints. Accounting for the spatial and transport properties of the waste-to-energy supply chains is crucial for understanding the problem and improving the supply chain designs. The most significant challenge is the distributed nature of the waste generation and the household energy demands. The current work proposes concepts and a procedure for targeting the size of the municipal solid waste collection zone as the first step in the waste-to-energy supply chains synthesis. The formulated concepts and the provided case study reveal trends of reducing the net greenhouse gas savings and energy recovery by increasing the collection zone size. Population density has a positive correlation with the greenhouse gas saving and energy recovery performance. For smaller zone size the energy recovery from waste approaches and in some cases may surpass the energy spent on waste transportation. The energy recovery and greenhouse gas savings remain significant even for collection zones as large as 200 km2. The obtained trends are discussed and key directions for future work are proposed. [graphic not available: see fulltext]
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 744
页数:13
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Nagy T(2015)Model verification and analysis of the CO International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 39 236-244
[2]  
Mizsey P(2018)-MEA absorber–desorber system Journal of Cleaner Production 174 177-183
[3]  
Fan Y V(2012)Process efficiency optimisation and integration for cleaner production Process Safety and Environmental Protection 90 263-284
[4]  
Varbanov P S(2017)Waste as alternative fuel—Minimising emissions and effluents by advanced design Waste Management (New York, N.Y.) 61 78-86
[5]  
Klemeš J J(2015)Effect of materials mixture on the higher heating value: Case of biomass, biochar and municipal solid waste Waste Management (New York, N.Y.) 43 9-18
[6]  
Nemet A(2014)Optimization of municipal solid waste collection and transportation routes Waste Management (New York, N.Y.) 34 553-561
[7]  
Fodor Z(2014)A multi-echelon supply chain model for municipal solid waste management system Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 33 719-728
[8]  
Klemeš J J(2017)Sustainable management of waste-to-energy facilities Waste Management (New York, N.Y.) 64 358-370
[9]  
Boumanchar I(2007)Global reverse supply chain design for solid waste recycling under uncertainties and carbon emission constraint Energy Policy 35 2622-2634
[10]  
Chhiti Y(1995)Distributed or centralised energy-from-waste policy? Implications of technology and scale at municipal level Land Use Policy 12 29-36