A long-term bibliometric analysis of journals influencing management accounting and control research

被引:0
作者
Marit Terese Balstad
Terje Berg
机构
[1] Norwegian University of Science and Technology,Technology Library
[2] Norwegian University of Science and Technology,NTNU Business School
来源
Journal of Management Control | 2020年 / 30卷
关键词
Management accounting; Bibliometrics; Big six; Journals; Citations; Web of science; Scopus; Google scholar; M49;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper explores which journals publish management accounting research and which sources are most cited in these journals. We apply bibliometric methods based on citation data from Web of Science and Scopus. Quantitatively, we examined the boundaries of management accounting by analysing 506,753 and 1,075,838 cited references from each respective database in the timespans 1945–2018 and 1960–2018 and found that the five most cited journals represent 6.5% and 4.7% of the total citations. The most cited journal in both Web of Science and Scopus is AOS, followed by MAR. The findings are discussed in light of diversity, and the article will claim that the boundaries of management accounting research are not subject to severe constraints. Google Scholar was initially chosen alongside Web of Science and Scopus, but, among other challenges, Google Scholar does not provide comparable citation data. Therefore, issues concerning using citation data and databases are also thoroughly discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 380
页数:23
相关论文
共 108 条
[41]  
Garfield E(2010)Paradigms in accounting research: A view from North America Management Accounting Research 21 116-120
[42]  
Gendron Y(2008)Transfer und Austausch von Wissen in der Accounting-Forschung: Eine Zitations-und Kozitationsanalyse englischsprachiger Accounting-Journals 1990–2004 ZFBF: Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 60 153-181
[43]  
Gendron Y(2018)Drivers of citation: An analysis of ‘top’ accounting journals Critical Perspectives on Accounting 51 24-46
[44]  
Günther TW(2012)Is accounting research stagnant? Accounting Horizons 26 845-850
[45]  
Günther TW(2016)Has concentration in the top accounting journals changed over time? Accounting Horizons 30 63-78
[46]  
Heinicke A(2010)Is European accounting research fairly reflected in academic journals? An investigation of possible non-mainstream and language barrier biases European Accounting Review 19 161-190
[47]  
Guthrie J(2018)We can do so much better: Reflections on reading “signaling effects of scholarly profiles—The editorial teams of North American Accounting Association Journals Critical Perspectives on Accounting 51 70-77
[48]  
Parker LD(2015)Barriers to knowledge creation in management accounting research Journal of Management Accounting Research 27 151-170
[49]  
Dumay J(2018)Signaling effects of scholarly profiles—The editorial teams of North American accounting association journals: A personal perspective Critical Perspectives on Accounting 51 78-83
[50]  
Milne MJ(2018)A conceptual framework for teaching management accounting Journal of Accounting Education 44 25-34