Effects of Group-Dynamic Assessment and Process-Based Instruction on EFL Learners’ Metacognitive Awareness and Listening Comprehension: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry

被引:0
作者
Afsheen Rezai
Parisa Ashkani
Sayed M. Ismail
机构
[1] Ayatollah Ozma Burojerdi University,College of Humanities and Sciences
[2] Ayatollah Ozma Burojerdi University,undefined
[3] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University,undefined
来源
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research | 2023年 / 52卷
关键词
Group-dynamic assessment; Process-based Instruction; Metacognitive awareness; Listening comprehension; A mixed-methods design; EFL learners;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although a range of studies has explored the effectiveness of group-dynamic assessment (G-DA) and process-based instruction (PBI) in second language (L2) learning, no study has compared the effects of G-DA and PBI on EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness (MA) and listening comprehension (LC). Thus, this study aimed to explore the effects of G-DA and PBI on fostering EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness (MA) and listening comprehension (LC) in Iran. For this purpose, a total of one hundred and sixty intermediate EFL learners were selected through a convenience sampling method at Iran Language Institute (ILI) and were homogenized using the Key English Test (KET). The EFL learners whose scores fell around the mean score were chosen and randomly allocated as G-DA group (n = 30), PBI group (n = 30), and control group (n = 30). Afterward, they went through a pre-test, interventions (lasting 16 one-hour sessions held twice a week) and a post-test. The interactions in the classes were also meticulously recorded. The collected data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and a microgenetic development approach. Findings evidenced that the G-DA group and PBI group outperformed the control group concerning the gains in MA and LC. However, the findings evidenced that G-DA was more effective than PBI to foster the EFL learners’ MA and LC. Additionally, the complementary qualitative results documented that the proper feedback offered in line with the principles and procedures of G-DA and PBI contributed to developing the participants’ MA and LC. The study ends by offering some implications for the relevant stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:1345 / 1370
页数:25
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Abdolrezapour P(2017)Improving L2 reading comprehension through emotionalized dynamic assessment procedures Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46 747-770
[2]  
Ableeva R(2011)Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18 133-149
[3]  
Lantolf J(2018)Interactionist and interventionist group dynamic assessment (GDA) and EFL learners' listening comprehension development Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 6 37-56
[4]  
Ahmadi Safa M(2013)EFL listeners' strategy development and listening problems: A process-based study Journal of Asia TEFL 10 1-23
[5]  
Beheshti S(2012)Group dynamic assessment: An inventory of mediational strategies for teaching listening The Journal of Teaching Language Skills 3 27-58
[6]  
Ai-hua C(1994)Negative feedback as regulation and learning in the zone of proximal development Modern Language Journal 78 465-483
[7]  
Alavi SM(2019)The effects of vocabulary enhancement exercises and group dynamic assessment on word learning through lexical inferencing Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48 889-901
[8]  
Kaivanpanah Sh(2018)Applying interventionist and interactionist approaches to dynamic assessment for L2 listening comprehension International Journal of Instruction 11 681-700
[9]  
Shabani K(2022)Developing students' listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness through metacognitive process-based listening instruction Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics 4 84-93
[10]  
Aljaafreh A(2013)The impact of dynamic assessment on reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in Iranian high school learners International Journal of Language Testing 3 60-77