Prognostic value of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bulky stage Ib2 and IIa cervical squamous cell cancer patients

被引:0
|
作者
Yun Liang
Bingjian Lü
Xiaoduan Chen
Jiale Qin
Xiaodong Cheng
Xing Xie
Weiguo Lü
机构
[1] Zhejiang University,Department of Surgical Pathology, the Affiliated Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine
[2] Zhejiang University,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2016年 / 468卷
关键词
Cervical squamous cell cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Tumor regression; Disease-free survival; Overall survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used to treat patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Optimal pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy has proven to be a good prognostic indicator for patient survival, but the prognostic significance of a partial response remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic predictors for patients with partial response. We included in the study 190 patients with bulky stage Ib2 or IIa cervical squamous cell cancer, who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. A novel pathological grading system, including optimal response (complete disappearance of tumor, grade 1), viable tumor cells occupying <2/3 (grade 2) or >2/3 (grade 3) of the tumor bed area and extra-cervical tumor deposits (grade 4), was developed and associations with disease-free survival and overall survival were studied. Survival analysis was conducted using log-rank testing and Cox regression analysis. We found statistically significant differences between 4 different pathological response groups both in terms of disease-free survival (p = 0.001) and overall survival (p = 0.003). Combining adjacent survival curves in the pathological grading system allowed us to identify response grade 2 patients with disease-free and overall survival similar to those of optimal response patients (p = 0.000, p = 0.002). Multivariate analyses showed that the pathological response grading system is the only independent predictor for progression-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.001 and p = 0.007). A response grading system based on pathological parameters may be useful to predict both progression-free and overall survival in bulky stage Ib2 and IIa cervical squamous cell cancer patients treated with NAC.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 336
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current management of stage IB2 and bulky IIA, locally advanced, and recurrent cervical carcinoma
    Lo, Karen K.
    Rodriguez, Anne O.
    Ryu, Janice
    Khatri, Vijay P.
    ONCOLOGY REVIEWS, 2008, 2 (02) : 117 - 128
  • [32] Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Kecheng Huang
    Haiying Sun
    Xiong Li
    Ting Hu
    Ru Yang
    ShaoShuai Wang
    Yao Jia
    Zhilan Chen
    Fangxu Tang
    Jian Shen
    Xiaomin Qin
    Hang Zhou
    Runfeng Yang
    Juan Gui
    Lin Wang
    Xiaolin Zhao
    Jincheng Zhang
    Jiong Liu
    Lili Guo
    Shuang Li
    Shixuan Wang
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [33] A Single-Institution Radical Surgery Results in Stage IB2/IIA2 (Bulky) Cervical Cancer
    Khatib, Ghanim
    Gulec, Umran Kucukgoz
    Guzel, Ahmet Baris
    Uygur, Berk
    Seydaoglu, Gulsah
    Gumurdulu, Derya
    Vardar, Mehmet Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 (08) : 1480 - 1484
  • [34] Optimal pathological response indicated better long-term outcome among patients with stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Huang, Kecheng
    Sun, Haiying
    Chen, Zhilan
    Li, Xiong
    Wang, ShaoShuai
    Zhao, Xiaolin
    Tang, Fangxu
    Jia, Yao
    Hu, Ting
    Du, Xiaofang
    Wang, Haoran
    Lu, Zhiyong
    Huang, Jia
    Gui, Juan
    Wang, Xiaoli
    Zhou, Shasha
    Wang, Lin
    Zhang, Jincheng
    Guo, Lili
    Yang, Ru
    Shen, Jian
    Zhang, Qinghua
    Li, Shuang
    Wang, Shixuan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [35] Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Huang, Kecheng
    Sun, Haiying
    Li, Xiong
    Hu, Ting
    Yang, Ru
    Wang, ShaoShuai
    Jia, Yao
    Chen, Zhilan
    Tang, Fangxu
    Shen, Jian
    Qin, Xiaomin
    Zhou, Hang
    Yang, Runfeng
    Gui, Juan
    Wang, Lin
    Zhao, Xiaolin
    Zhang, Jincheng
    Liu, Jiong
    Guo, Lili
    Li, Shuang
    Wang, Shixuan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [36] Optimal pathological response indicated better long-term outcome among patients with stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Kecheng Huang
    Haiying Sun
    Zhilan Chen
    Xiong Li
    ShaoShuai Wang
    Xiaolin Zhao
    Fangxu Tang
    Yao Jia
    Ting Hu
    Xiaofang Du
    Haoran Wang
    Zhiyong Lu
    Jia Huang
    Juan Gui
    Xiaoli Wang
    Shasha Zhou
    Lin Wang
    Jincheng Zhang
    Lili Guo
    Ru Yang
    Jian Shen
    Qinghua Zhang
    Shuang Li
    Shixuan Wang
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [37] Are the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB2 cervical cancer similar in pregnant and nonpregnant patient?
    Morice, Philippe
    Uzan, Catherine
    Leary, Alexandra
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 127 (01) : 257 - +
  • [38] Single institution experience with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB2 cervical cancer in Peru.
    Mas Lopez, Luis Alberto
    Lopez, A.
    Alvarez, M.
    Limon, R.
    Marrufo, C.
    Ruiz, R.
    Serrano, F.
    Pacheco, C.
    Valdiviezo, N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [39] High-dose neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB bulky cervical cancer
    Robova, H.
    Pluta, M.
    Kacirek, J.
    Halaska, M.
    Skapa, P.
    Rob, L.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (02) : S46 - S46
  • [40] Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in (bulky) squamous cell carcinoma of cervix stage IB2
    Termrungruanglert, W
    Tresukosol, D
    Vasuratna, A
    Sittisomwong, T
    Lertkhachonsuk, R
    Sirisabya, N
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 97 (02) : 576 - 581