PCSK9 Inhibitors: Potential in Cardiovascular Therapeutics

被引:0
作者
Rose Q. Do
Robert A. Vogel
Gregory G. Schwartz
机构
[1] VA Medical Center,Cardiology Section 111B
[2] University of Colorado Denver,undefined
[3] VA Medical Center,undefined
来源
Current Cardiology Reports | 2013年 / 15卷
关键词
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; LDL cholesterol; LDL receptor; Antisense oligonucleotides; Monoclonal antibodies; PCSK9 inhibitors; Cardiovascular therapeutics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the efficacy of statin therapy, patients treated with these agents face substantial residual risk that is associated with achieved levels of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). These observations suggest a potential benefit of additional strategies to promote further LDL-C reduction. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has emerged as an attractive target in this regard. Abrogation of PCSK9 function prevents PCSK9-mediated catabolism of LDL receptors, increases cell surface LDL receptor density, and promotes clearance of LDL and other atherogenic lipoproteins from the circulation. Thus far, the most advanced approaches to block PCSK9 action are monoclonal antibodies and anti-sense oligonucleotides. Among statin-treated patients, these agents may produce additional LDL-C lowering exceeding 50 %. In rare genetic experiments of nature, individuals with dominant negative or dual loss of function mutations of PCSK9 appear to have no adverse health effects resulting from lifelong, very low levels of LDL-C. In short-term trials, PCSK9 antibodies have been generally well-tolerated. However, evidence to support long-term safety and efficacy of PCSK9 therapy to reduce cardiovascular risk awaits the results of large cardiovascular outcome trials.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 287 条
  • [1] Wilson PW(1980)Prevalence of coronary heart disease in the Framingham Offspring Study: role of lipoprotein cholesterols Am J Cardiol 46 649-54
  • [2] Garrison RJ(2002)Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial Lancet 360 7-22
  • [3] Castelli WP(2010)Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Lancet 376 1670-81
  • [4] Feinleib M(2004)Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: lower is better and physiologically normal J Am Coll Cardiol 43 2142-6
  • [5] McNamara PM(1997)Prospective 10-year evaluation of hypobetalipoproteinemia in a cohort of 772 firefighters and cross-sectional evaluation of hypocholesterolemia in 1,479 men in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Metabolism 46 625-33
  • [6] Kannel WB(2005)Can low-density lipoprotein be too low? The safety and efficacy of achieving very low low-density lipoprotein with intensive statin therapy: a PROVE IT-TIMI 22 substudy J Am Coll Cardiol 46 1411-6
  • [7] Baigent C(2011)Cardiovascular event reduction and adverse events among subjects attaining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <50 mg/dl with rosuvastatin. The JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) J Am Coll Cardiol 57 1666-75
  • [8] Blackwell L(2011)Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy N Engl J Med 365 2255-67
  • [9] Emberson J(2008)Rationale and design of IMPROVE-IT (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial): comparison of ezetimbe/simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes Am Heart J 156 826-32
  • [10] O’Keefe JH(2004)Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines Circulation 110 227-39