Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? a randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam

被引:13
|
作者
Hisamuddin N. [1 ,3 ]
Rahman N.A. [1 ,3 ]
Hashim A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Consultant and Head of Emergency Medicine, PPSP, USM, Kubang Kerian
[2] Department of Emergency and Trauma, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah
[3] Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, USM
关键词
Emergency department; Midazolam; Procedural sedation analgesia; Propofol;
D O I
10.1007/s12245-010-0162-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study examined the safety and effectiveness of the procedural sedation analgesia (PSA) technique carried out in the emergency department (ED) of a university hospital over a period of 1 year. The research was done to compare the effectiveness and efficacy of moderate sedation of fentanyl combined with either mid-azolam or propofol for any brief, intense procedure in the ED setting. Aims The objectives were to observe the occurrence of adverse events in subjects undergoing PSA for intense and painful procedures in the emergency department and to implement the use of capnography as a method of monitoring the patients when they were under PSA. Methods Forty patients were selected for this study. They were randomly divided into two equal groups using the computer-generated random permuted blocks of four patients. Twenty patients were grouped together as group A and the remaining 20 patients as group B. Drugs used were single blinded to prevent any bias. Drug A was propofol and fentanyl, while drug B was midazolam and fentanyl. The procedures involved included orthopedic manipulation such as reduction of fractures, reduction of dislocated joints, abscess drainage, wound debridement, laceration wound repair and cardioversion. All of the subjects were monitored for their vital signs and end tidal carbon dioxide level every 10 min till the PSA was completed. The duration of stay in the ED was documented when the subjects had completed the procedure and were released from the department. Result Of the study population, 75.6% were males. The mean age was 37.8 years (95% CI 33.2, 39.8). None of the patients developed any major complications while under PSA. The vital signs pre-, intra- and post-procedure were not significantly different in either the propofol or miz-adolam groups (p value >0.05). Conclusion This study had proven that there was no difference in adverse event occurrence between the studied drugs during PSA. Propofol can be recommended for use in PSA if the operator is well trained and familiar with the drug. © Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2010.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 113
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Propofol for premedication in gastroscopies - a randomized comparison to midazolam
    Hofmann, C
    Kiesslich, R
    Brackertz, A
    Jung, M
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 1999, 37 (07): : 589 - 595
  • [22] A cost-effectiveness analysis of propofol versus midazolam for procedural sedation in the emergency department
    Hohl, Corinne Michele
    Nosyk, Bohdan
    Sadatsafavi, Mohsen
    Anis, Aslarn Hayat
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [23] Effect of the midazolam added with propofol-based sedation in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A randomized trial
    Kim, Eun Hye
    Park, Jun Chul
    Shin, Sung Kwan
    Lee, Yong Chan
    Lee, Sang Kil
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 (04) : 894 - 899
  • [24] The comparison of propofol and midazolam for bronchoscopy A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Wang, Zhizhen
    Hu, Zhi
    Dai, Tianyang
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (36)
  • [25] Randomized controlled trial for endoscopy with propofol versus midazolam on psychometric tests and critical flicker frequency in people with cirrhosis
    Agrawal, Amit
    Sharma, Barjesh Chander
    Sharma, Praveen
    Uppal, Rajiv
    Sarin, Shiv Kumar
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 (11) : 1726 - 1732
  • [26] Effect of small dose propofol or midazolam to prevent laryngospasm and coughing following oropharyngeal surgeries: Randomized controlled trial
    Shaban, Amira A.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 32 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [27] Safety and clinical effectiveness of midazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department: A systematic review
    Hohl, Corinne Michele
    Sadatsafavi, Mohsen
    Nosyk, Bohdan
    Anis, Aslam Hayat
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [28] Use of propofol for procedural sedation reduces length of stay in the emergency department
    J Millar
    F Adamson
    P O'Connor
    R Wilson
    E Ferrie
    R McLaughlin
    Critical Care, 17 (Suppl 2):
  • [29] Propofol versus meperidine and midazolam as a conscious sedation in percutaneous vertebroplasty: Prospective randomized trial
    Amer, Asmaa Fawzy
    Salama, Eman Ramadan
    Elatrozy, Hytham Ibrahim
    INDIAN ANAESTHETISTS FORUM, 2018, 19 (02): : 56 - 60
  • [30] Propofol for procedural sedation in the pediatric emergency department
    Pershad, J
    Godambe, SA
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 27 (01) : 11 - 14