Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? a randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam

被引:13
|
作者
Hisamuddin N. [1 ,3 ]
Rahman N.A. [1 ,3 ]
Hashim A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Consultant and Head of Emergency Medicine, PPSP, USM, Kubang Kerian
[2] Department of Emergency and Trauma, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah
[3] Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, USM
关键词
Emergency department; Midazolam; Procedural sedation analgesia; Propofol;
D O I
10.1007/s12245-010-0162-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study examined the safety and effectiveness of the procedural sedation analgesia (PSA) technique carried out in the emergency department (ED) of a university hospital over a period of 1 year. The research was done to compare the effectiveness and efficacy of moderate sedation of fentanyl combined with either mid-azolam or propofol for any brief, intense procedure in the ED setting. Aims The objectives were to observe the occurrence of adverse events in subjects undergoing PSA for intense and painful procedures in the emergency department and to implement the use of capnography as a method of monitoring the patients when they were under PSA. Methods Forty patients were selected for this study. They were randomly divided into two equal groups using the computer-generated random permuted blocks of four patients. Twenty patients were grouped together as group A and the remaining 20 patients as group B. Drugs used were single blinded to prevent any bias. Drug A was propofol and fentanyl, while drug B was midazolam and fentanyl. The procedures involved included orthopedic manipulation such as reduction of fractures, reduction of dislocated joints, abscess drainage, wound debridement, laceration wound repair and cardioversion. All of the subjects were monitored for their vital signs and end tidal carbon dioxide level every 10 min till the PSA was completed. The duration of stay in the ED was documented when the subjects had completed the procedure and were released from the department. Result Of the study population, 75.6% were males. The mean age was 37.8 years (95% CI 33.2, 39.8). None of the patients developed any major complications while under PSA. The vital signs pre-, intra- and post-procedure were not significantly different in either the propofol or miz-adolam groups (p value >0.05). Conclusion This study had proven that there was no difference in adverse event occurrence between the studied drugs during PSA. Propofol can be recommended for use in PSA if the operator is well trained and familiar with the drug. © Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2010.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 113
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ketamine/Propofol Versus Propofol Alone for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation
    David, Henry
    Shipp, Joseph
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 57 (05) : 435 - 441
  • [2] Propofol Versus Midazolam for Procedural Sedation of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation in Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Hatamabadi, Hamid Reza
    Dolatabadi, Ali Arhami
    Derakhshanfar, Hojjat
    Younesian, Somaye
    Shad, Ensieh Ghaffari
    TRAUMA MONTHLY, 2015, 20 (02) : 4 - 7
  • [3] Propofol versus midazolam for intubating preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial
    M G Penido
    D F de Oliveira Silva
    E C Tavares
    Y P e Silva
    Journal of Perinatology, 2011, 31 : 356 - 360
  • [4] Propofol versus midazolam for intubating preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial
    Penido, M. G.
    de Oliveira Silva, D. F.
    Tavares, E. C.
    Silva, Y. P. e
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2011, 31 (05) : 356 - 360
  • [5] Randomized Clinical Trial of Propofol Versus Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department
    Miner, James R.
    Gray, Richard O.
    Bahr, Jennifer
    Patel, Roma
    McGill, John W.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 17 (06) : 604 - 611
  • [6] The use of propofol for sedation in the emergency department
    Swanson, ER
    Seaberg, DC
    Mathias, S
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 3 (03) : 234 - 238
  • [7] Nonanesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Versus Midazolam and Propofol, Titrated to Moderate Sedation, for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Javier Molina-Infante
    Carmen Dueñas-Sadornil
    Jose M. Mateos-Rodriguez
    Belen Perez-Gallardo
    Gema Vinagre-Rodríguez
    Moises Hernandez-Alonso
    Miguel Fernandez-Bermejo
    Ferran Gonzalez-Huix
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2012, 57 : 2385 - 2393
  • [8] Nonanesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Versus Midazolam and Propofol, Titrated to Moderate Sedation, for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Molina-Infante, Javier
    Duenas-Sadornil, Carmen
    Mateos-Rodriguez, Jose M.
    Perez-Gallardo, Belen
    Vinagre-Rodriguez, Gema
    Hernandez-Alonso, Moises
    Fernandez-Bermejo, Miguel
    Gonzalez-Huix, Ferran
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2012, 57 (09) : 2385 - 2393
  • [9] Randomized Clinical Trial of Propofol With and Without Alfentanil for Deep Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department
    Miner, James R.
    Gray, Richard O.
    Stephens, Dana
    Biros, Michelle H.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (09) : 825 - 834
  • [10] A clinical trial of propofol vs midazolam for procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department
    Havel, CJ
    Strait, RT
    Hennes, H
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 6 (10) : 989 - 997