Effects of rural electrification on household welfare: a meta-regression analysis

被引:0
作者
Ayana O.U. [1 ]
Degaga J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics, School of Business& Economics, Ambo University, P.O.Box 217, Ambo
[2] Department of Agricultural Economics, Ambo University, Ambo
关键词
Effect; Electrification; Meta-regression; Publication bias; Rural;
D O I
10.1007/s12232-022-00391-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is almost a consensus that electrification improves household well-being. However, review of existing literature reveals mixed and inconclusive results. Thus, this study is conducted to objectively summarize the effect-size estimates from primary studies, to identify the degree of publication bias and underlying genuine effects using meta-regression-analysis. We also examined the sources of heterogeneity in effect-size estimates from primary studies. We synthesized effect size estimates from those studies focusing on the effects of rural electrification on income, education, employment, time use and women empowerment using meta-regression approach. Indeed, our finding indicates that rural electrification improves rural household welfare. The result shows that there is genuine effect of rural electrification on household welfare indicators after publication bias is filtered out. Specifically, our finding shows that rural electrification has a statistically significant positive genuine effect on household education, employment, income, time uses and women empowerment. However, the study did not find strong evidence for the presence of publication selection for the included welfare outcomes, except for educational outcome. Therefore, collaborative interventions by national governments, international development assistance programs and donor agencies can play a crucial role in the provision of electricity to the poor households in least developed countries (LDCs) to change their life. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 261
页数:52
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantifying heterogeneity, heteroscedasticity and publication bias effects on technical efficiency estimates of rice farming: A meta-regression analysis
    Phuc Trong Ho
    Burton, Michael
    Ma, Chunbo
    Hailu, Atakelty
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 73 (02) : 580 - 597
  • [33] Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate
    Knapp, G
    Hartung, J
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (17) : 2693 - 2710
  • [34] Multivariate random-effects meta-regression: Updates to mvmeta
    White, Ian R.
    STATA JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (02) : 255 - 270
  • [35] China's electrification and rural labor: Analysis with fuzzy regression discontinuity
    He, Xiaoping
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 : 650 - 660
  • [36] Effects of hesperidin on anti-inflammatory and antioxidant response in healthy people: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Buzdagli, Yusuf
    Eyipinar, Cemre Didem
    Kaci, Fatma Necmiye
    Tekin, Aslihan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2023, 33 (12) : 1390 - 1405
  • [37] Analysis of heterogeneity in a systematic review using meta-regression technique
    Lo, Kenneth
    Stephenson, Matthew
    Lockwood, Craig
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2019, 17 (02) : 131 - 142
  • [38] Self-help treatment of anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of effects and potential moderators
    Haug, Thomas
    Nordgreen, Tine
    Ost, Lars Goran
    Havik, Odd E.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 32 (05) : 425 - 445
  • [39] Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach
    van Aert, Robbie C. M.
    Wicherts, Jelte M.
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2024, 56 (03) : 1994 - 2012
  • [40] The Rising Relative Risk of Mortality for Singles: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
    Roelfs, David J.
    Shor, Eran
    Kalish, Rachel
    Yogev, Tamar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 174 (04) : 379 - 389