A phase I–II study of bi-weekly gemcitabine and irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer after prior taxane + platinum-based regimens

被引:0
作者
Christos Kosmas
Nicolas Tsavaris
Konstantinos Syrigos
Angelos Koutras
George Tsakonas
Thomas Makatsoris
Nicolas Mylonakis
Athanasios Karabelis
George P. Stathopoulos
Haralambos P. Kalofonos
机构
[1] “Metaxa” Cancer Hospital,Second Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine
[2] Piraues,Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Pathophysiology
[3] Athens University School of Medicine,Department of Medicine
[4] Laikon General Hospital,Oncology Unit, 3rd Department of Medicine
[5] Chest Diseases Hospital,Department of Medicine
[6] Athens University School of Medicine,Oncology
[7] Patras University Hospital,undefined
[8] Rio,undefined
[9] Eric Dunnan Hospital,undefined
来源
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 2007年 / 59卷
关键词
Gemcitabine; Irinotecan; Phase I; Chemotherapy; Lung cancer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Treatment options in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of poor activity of most agents after failure of platinum-based therapy. In the present phase I–II study, we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of bi-weekly gemcitabine (GEM) + irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with relapsed NSCLC. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC, WHO-performance status (PS) ≤ 2, prior taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered in a dose-escalated fashion in subgroups of 3–6 patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was encountered as follows: CPT-11 150 or 180 mg/m2 followed by GEM 1,200–1,800 mg/m2, both on days 1 + 15, recycled every 28 days in four dose levels (DLs). Results: Forty-nine patients entered the phase I and II part of the study (phase I: 12–phase II: 37 + 3 at DL-3), and 40 patients were evaluable for a response in phase II and all for toxicity: median age, 61 years (range 36–74); PS, 1 (0–2); gender, 43 males/6 females—histologies; adenocarcinoma, 25; squamous, 20; large cell, 4. Metastatic sites included lymph nodes, 38; bone, 5; liver, 4; brain, 3; lung nodules, 14; adrenals, 13; other, 3. All patients had prior taxane + platinum-based treatment, and 42 patients had prior docetaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin/or–carboplatin regimens. DLT was observed at DL-4 and included 2/3 cases with grade 3 diarrhea—1/3 of these with febrile neutropenia. The recommended DL for phase II evaluation was DL3: GEM, 1,500 + CPT-11—180 mg/m2. Objective responses in phase II were PR, 6/40 [15%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5–31%]; stable disease, 16/40 (40%; 95% CI, 21–53%); and progressive disease, 18/40 (45%; 95% CI, 28.5–62.5%). The median time-to-progression was 4 months (range 1–12) and median survival 7 months (range 1.5–42 +), while 1-year survival was 20%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 18% of patients (6% grade 4) and 6% incidence of febrile neutropenia. No Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were seen, grade 3 diarrhea in 6% of patients and grade 2 in 15% of patients, while other grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were never encountered. Conclusions: Bi-weekly GEM + CPT-11 is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC failing prior taxane + platinum regimens, and represents an effective and convenient combination to apply in the palliative treatment of relapsed NSCLC particularly after failure of first-line docetaxel + platinum-based regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 278 条
[1]  
Shepherd FA(2000)Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy J Clin Oncol 18 2095-2103
[2]  
Dancey J(2000)Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens J Clin Oncol 18 2354-2362
[3]  
Ramlau R(2000)Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 18 122-130
[4]  
Mattson K(1998)Phase II randomized multicenter trial of two dose schedules of gemcitabine as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17 484a-2085
[5]  
Gralla R(1998)Salvage therapy with gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer progressing after prior carboplatin-paclitaxel Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17 463a-20
[6]  
O’Rourke M(1999)Gemcitabine as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial J Clin Oncol 17 2081-1191
[7]  
Levitan N(1992)A phase II study of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, for previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 10 16-50
[8]  
Gressot L(1995)Phase II study of CPT-11 (irinotecan) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 14 365a-66
[9]  
Vincent M(2002)Irinotecan plus gemcitabine induces both radiographic and CA 19-9 tumor marker responses in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer J Clin Oncol 20 1182-147
[10]  
Burkes R(1999)Single-agent gemcitabine and gemcitabine/irinotecan combination (IrimoGem) in non-small cell lung cancer Semin Oncol 26 43-341