Detection of living cells in non-processed but deep-frozen bone allografts

被引:43
作者
Heyligers I.C. [1 ]
Klein-Nulend J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Skeletal Tissue Engineering Group, Amsterdam STEGA, Heerlen, Atrium MC
[2] Department of Oral Cell Biology, Skeletal Tissue Engineering Group, ACTA-Vrije Universiteit, 1007 MB Amsterdam
关键词
Bone bank; Bone cell; Femoral head allograft; Impaction grafting; Total hip arthroplasty;
D O I
10.1007/s10561-005-1089-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Impacted morselized donor bone is successfully used to treat bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasties. It is generally thought, but not proven, that the processing and storage at - 80°C of the donor bone kills all cells. Because of the risk of contamination and to increase our understanding about the process of new bone formation after revision total hip arthroplasty, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the donor bone does contain vital cells. Samples from 11 femoral heads were obtained according to the American and European standards of bone banking, and tested for their capacity to give rise to proliferating cells, using tissue culture methods. All bone samples were stored at -80°C for a minimum of 6 months. Bone sample cores were morselized and cultured for 6 weeks. Inverted phase contrast microscopy was used to evaluate cell growth. DNA marker analysis was used to confirm celluar identity. All bank bone samples gave rise to cell growth. The cell cultures showed osteoblastic characteristics in that they expressed high levels of alkaline phosphatase activity. DNA marker analysis showed identical alleles for cultured cells from frozen bone and freshly obtained buccal cells from the same donor, indicating that the cells growing from the banked bone were indeed originating from the donor tissue. It was therefore concluded that - 80°C freezing of bone tissue does not routinely kill cells within the tissue. © Springer 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Standards for Tissue Banking, (1996)
[2]  
Aspenberg P., Tagil M., Kristensson C., Lidin S., Bone graft proteins influence osteoconduction. A titanium chamber study in rats, Acta Orthop. Scand., 67, pp. 377-382, (1996)
[3]  
Aubin J.E., Liu F., The osteoblast lineage, Principles of Bone Biology, pp. 51-68, (1996)
[4]  
Beresford J.N., Gallagher J.A., Gowen M., McGuire M.K.B., Poser J., Russell R.G.G., Human bone cells in culture. A novel system for the investigation of bone cell metabolism, Clin. Sci. (Colch), 64, pp. 38-39, (1983)
[5]  
van Biezen F.C., ten Have B.L., Verhaar J.A., Impaction bone-grafting of severely defective femora in revision total hip surgery: 21 hips followed for 41-85 months, Acta Orthop. Scand., 71, 2, pp. 135-142, (2000)
[6]  
Buma P., Lamerigts N., Schreurs B.W., Gardeniers J., Versleyen D., Slooff T.J., Impacted graft incorporation after cemented acetabular revision Histological evaluation in 8 patients, Acta Orthop. Scand., 67, pp. 536-540, (1996)
[7]  
Burwell R.G., Gowland G., Studies in the transplantation of Bone III. The immune responses of lymph nodes draining components of fresh homologous cancellous bone and homologous bone treated by different methods, J. Bone Joint Surg., 44 B, (1962)
[8]  
Burwell R.G., Studies in the transplantation of bone IV. The immune response of lymph nodes draining second-set homografts of fresh cancellous bone, J. Bone Joint Surg., 44 B, (1962)
[9]  
Transmission of HIV through bone transplantation: Case report and public health recommendations, MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 37, pp. 597-599, (1988)
[10]  
Hepatitis C virus transmissions from an antibody-negative organ and tissue donor - United States, 2002-2002, MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 52, 13, pp. 273-276, (2003)