An overview of air emission intensities and environmental performance of grey cement manufacturing in Canada

被引:0
作者
Darren Brown
Rehan Sadiq
Kasun Hewage
机构
[1] University of British Columbia,School of Engineering (Okanagan Campus)
来源
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | 2014年 / 16卷
关键词
Air emissions; Grey cement manufacturing; Environmental performance; Energy intensive and trade exposed industry (EITE); Leakage;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Air emissions generated in grey cement manufacturing originate primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels required to heat the kiln and the chemical reaction of raw materials in the pyroprocessing phase. Given that the kiln system is enclosed, air emissions generated, discharge from a single point source kiln stack. Unlike other industries, the point source kiln stack enables the cement sector to accurately monitor and record total air emissions. The largest contributors to air emissions from grey cement manufacturing are carbon dioxide (CO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), sulphur dioxide (SO2) and dust/particulate matter (PM). In Canada, grey cement manufacturing facilities are required to annually report these emissions through the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI). Since CO2, NOx, SO2 and PM are the largest contributors to air emissions, and Canadian grey cement facilities are required to report these emissions, combining NPRI data with annual grey cement production data allows for the development of intensity-based environmental performance indicators. Based on data provided by NPRI, in combination with industry production, we can better understand the environmental performance of Canada’s grey cement manufacturing. On the global stage, intensity-based performance measures provide a useful tool for comparison and demonstrate a strong environmental performance for grey cement production in Canada. As an energy intensive and trade exposed (EITE) grey cement manufacturing is vulnerable to unbalanced environmental policy, which may ultimately result in leakage of production and air emissions to developing countries.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1131
页数:12
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] Ascough II(2008)Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making Ecol Model 219 383-399
  • [2] Maier HR(2007)Carbon leakage from unilateral environmental tax reforms in europe, 1995–2005 Energy Policy 35 6281-6292
  • [3] Ravalico JK(2009)Assessment of European union transition scenarios with a special focus on the issue of carbon leakage Energy Econ 31 S274-S284
  • [4] Strudley MW(2002)Emission factors of cement industry in turkey Water Air Soil Pollut 138 235-252
  • [5] Barker T(1988)Air pollution control in the Indian cement industry–an overview J Inst Eng (India) 68 39-42
  • [6] Junankar S(2009)Does a regional greenhouse gas policy make sense? A case study of carbon leakage and emissions spillover Energy Econ 31 667-675
  • [7] Pollitt H(2010)Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation J Clean Prod 18 478-485
  • [8] Summerton P(2004)End life tyres: alternative final disposal processes compared by LCA Energy 29 2089-2108
  • [9] Bernard A(2011)Components of carbon leakage in the fuel market due to biofuel policies Biofuels 2 119-121
  • [10] Vielle M(2010)CO Int J Greenh Gas Control 4 583-588