Is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective for chronic low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Mohammad Alwardat
Antonio Pisani
Mohammad Etoom
Roberta Carpenedo
Elisabetta Chinè
Mario Dauri
Francesca Leonardis
Silvia Natoli
机构
[1] University of Rome Tor Vergata,Department of Systems Medicine
[2] Isra University,Physical Therapy Department
[3] Policlinic of Tor Vergata,Unit of Pain Therapy
[4] University of Rome Tor Vergata,Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine
[5] University of Rome Tor Vergata,Department of Surgery
[6] Aqaba University of Technology,Department of Physical Therapy
来源
Journal of Neural Transmission | 2020年 / 127卷
关键词
Low back pain; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Neuromodulation; Systematic review; Chronic pain;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to reduce pain in range of chronic pain states. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of tDCS on pain reduction and related disability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP). A computer-based systematic literature search was performed in five databases according to PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of tDCS on pain and related disability in patients with non-specific CLBP were included. Modified Jadad scale and Cochrane's risk of bias assessment were used to determine the studies’ quality and risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) at 95% confidence interval (CI). Nine RCTs (411 participants) were included in the systematic review according to inclusion criteria, while only five studies could be included in the meta-analysis. The primary motor cortex (M1) was the main stimulated target. The meta-analysis showed non-significant effect of multiple sessions of tDCS over M1 on pain reduction and disability post-treatment respectively, (SMD = 0.378; 95% CI = − 0.264–1.020; P = 0.249), (SMD = 0.143; 95% CI = − 0.214–0.499; P = 0.434). No significant adverse events were reported. The current results do not support the clinical use of tDCS for the reduction of pain and related disability in non-specific CLBP. However, the limited number of available evidence limits our conclusions on the effectiveness of these approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1257 / 1270
页数:13
相关论文
共 203 条
[51]  
Blackburn B(2013)Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 123 1027-11431
[52]  
Chang WJ(2013)Transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind exploratory study Clin J Pain 70 1-1356
[53]  
O’Connell NE(2018)Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7 451-1120
[54]  
Beckenkamp PR(2010)Central modulation of pain J Clin Invest 125 89-1970
[55]  
Chou R(2011)Transdural motor cortex stimulation reverses neuropathic pain in rats: a profile of neuronal activation Eur J Pain 27 363-S15
[56]  
Deyo R(2012)Modulating cortico-striatal and thalamo-cortical functional connectivity with transcranial direct current stimulation Hum Brain Mapp 33 11425-9
[57]  
Friedly J(2011)Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation coupled with a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for the treatment of fibromyalgia Open Rheumatol J 32 1348-undefined
[58]  
Chou R(2019)Wearable electronics assess the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in Parkinson’s disease patients Sensors (Switzerland) 9 130-undefined
[59]  
Deyo R(2012)Effects of anodal tDCS on lumbar propriospinal system in healthy subjects Clin Neurophysiol 10 1113-undefined
[60]  
Friedly J(2017)Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015 J Am Coll Cardiol 139 1958-undefined