Identification of parameters and indicators for implementing circularity in the construction industry

被引：0

作者：

Kazmi R. ^{[1
]}

Chakraborty M. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Architecture & Planning, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi

来源：

Journal of Engineering and Applied Science | 2023年 / 70卷 / 01期

关键词：

Circular built environment; Circular economy; Circularity indicator; Delphi technique; Literature review;

D O I：

10.1186/s44147-023-00251-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The increase in population, rapid urbanization, the required infrastructure development, the linear development model adopted by the construction stakeholders, and the unaccountability of construction waste have put tremendous stress on existing natural resources. The world has witnessed a situation where resource optimization through mitigation strategies has become significant for sustainable construction. A circular economy keeps the resources in the loop for the longest possible, eliminating waste from the system. This paper attempts to identify the parameters and relevant indicators for bringing circularity to the construction industry. During the research, 144 indicators were identified through a literature review which was followed by a three-round Delphi survey to attain consensus from 30 experts. Finally, after three rounds, 78 indicators were shortlisted, which received maximum consensus among the experts (W = 0.75). Construction stakeholders and decision-makers can use the identified list of indicators to bring circularity to the construction industry. © 2023, The Author(s).

引用

共 141 条

[41]

Esa M.R., Halog A., Rigamonti L., Developing strategies for managing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia based on the concept of circular economy, J Mater Cycles Waste Manag, 19, 3, pp. 1144-1154, (2017)

[42]

Condotta M., Zatta E., Reuse of building elements in the architectural practice and the European regulatory context: inconsistencies and possible improvements, J Clean Prod, 318, (2021)

[43]

Bonoli A., Zanni S., Serrano-Bernardo F., Sustainability in building and construction within the framework of circular cities and european new green deal. The contribution of concrete recycling, Sustainability (Switzerland), 13, 4, pp. 1-16, (2021)

[44]

Cottafava D., Ritzen M., Circularity indicator for residentials buildings: addressing the gap between embodied impacts and design aspects, Resour Conserv Recycl, 164, (2021)

[45]

Lopez Ruiz L.A., Roca Ramon X., Gasso Domingo S., The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector – a review and an integrative model approach, J Clean Prod, 248, (2020)

[46]

yin Shen L., Langston C., Adaptive reuse potential: an examination of differences between urban and non urban projects, Facilities, 28, 1-2, pp. 6-16, (2010)

[47]

Assefa G., Ambler C., To demolish or not to demolish: life cycle consideration of repurposing buildings, Sustain Cities Soc, 28, pp. 146-153, (2017)

[48]

Liu J., Yi Y., Wang X., Exploring factors influencing construction waste reduction: a structural equation modeling approach, J Clean Prod, 276, (2020)

[49]

Heisel F., Rau-Oberhuber S., Calculation and evaluation of circularity indicators for the built environment using the case studies of UMAR and Madaster, J Clean Prod, 243, (2020)

[50]

Hossain M.U., Ng S.T., Critical consideration of buildings’ environmental impact assessment towards adoption of circular economy: an analytical review, J Clean Prod, 205, pp. 763-780, (2018)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →