In reply: A two-stage review process for randomized controlled trials: the ultimate solution for publication bias?

被引：0

作者：

Philip M. Jones

机构：

[1] University of Western Ontario,Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry

[2] University of Western Ontario,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics

来源：

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | 2016年 / 63卷

关键词：

Public Health; Research Question; Study Protocol; Baseline Characteristic; Publication Bias;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：1383 / 1383

共 5 条

[1]

Jones PM(2016)Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial Can J Anesth undefined undefined-undefined

[2]

Bainbridge D(2016)Newer isn’t always better: comparative effectiveness of sevoflurane and isoflurane in cardiac surgery Can J Anesth undefined undefined-undefined

[3]

Chu MW(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

[4]

Mathis MR(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

[5]

Kheterpal S(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

← 1 →