Multilevel models in international business research

被引:0
作者
Mark F Peterson
Jean-Luc Arregle
Xavier Martin
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic University,
[2] Maastricht University,undefined
[3] EM Lyon Business School,undefined
[4] School of Economics and Management,undefined
[5] Center for Innovation Research and Center for Research in Economics and Business Administration,undefined
[6] Tilburg University,undefined
来源
Journal of International Business Studies | 2012年 / 43卷
关键词
multilevel models; mixed linear methods; levels of analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple-level (or mixed linear) modeling (MLM) can simultaneously test hypotheses at several levels of analysis (usually two or three), or control for confounding effects at one level while testing hypotheses at others. Advances in multi-level modeling allow increased precision in quantitative international business (IB) research, and open up new methodological and conceptual possibilities. However, they create new challenges, and they are still not frequently used in IB research. In this editorial we outline some key methodological issues for the uses of MLM in IB, including criteria, sample size, and measure equivalence issues. We then examine promising directions for future multilevel IB research considering comparative opportunities at nation, multiple-nation cluster, and within-nation region levels, including large multilevel databases. We also consider its promise for MNE research about semi-globalization, interorganizational effects across nations, clusters within nations, and teams and subsidiaries within MNEs.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 457
页数:6
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Arregle JL(2006)Mode of international entry: The advantages of multilevel methods Management International Review 46 557-618
[2]  
Hebert L(2009)The regional dimension of MNEs’ foreign subsidiary localization Journal of International Business Studies 40 86-107
[3]  
Beamish PW(1996)Japanese firms and the decision to invest abroad: Business groups and regional core networks Review of Economics and Statistics 78 214-220
[4]  
Arregle JL(2004)Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent Organizational Research Methods 7 400-417
[5]  
Beamish PW(2010)Does subnational region matter? Foreign affiliate performance in the United States and China Strategic Management Journal 31 1226-1243
[6]  
Hebert L(2005)An alternative definition of economic regions in the United States based on similarities in state business cycles Review of Economics and Statistics 87 617-626
[7]  
Belderbos R(2004)Cross-national differences in managers’ willingness to justify ethically suspect behaviors: A test of institutional anomie theory Academy of Management Journal 47 411-421
[8]  
Sleuwaegen L(2010)What makes and what does Journal of International Business Studies 41 47-69
[9]  
Bliese PD(2010) make a real option? A study of equity shares in international joint ventures Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 41 135-151
[10]  
Hanges PJ(2003)Are individual-level and country-level value structures different? Testing Hofstede's legacy with the Schwartz Value Survey Journal of International Business Studies 34 138-152