Adjusted productivity costs of stroke by human capital and friction cost methods: a Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study

被引:0
作者
Ina Rissanen
Leena Ala-Mursula
Iiro Nerg
Marko Korhonen
机构
[1] University of Oulu,Center for Life Course Health Research
[2] Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu,Medical Research Center Oulu
[3] University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University,Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care
[4] University of Oulu,Oulu Business School, Department of Economics
来源
The European Journal of Health Economics | 2021年 / 22卷
关键词
Productivity costs; Human capital method; Friction cost method; Stroke; Cohort study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 545
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Liljas B(1998)How to calculate indirect costs in economic evaluations PharmacoEcon. 13 1-7
[2]  
van den Hout WB(2010)The value of productivity: human-capital versus friction-cost method Ann. Rheum. Dis. 69 89-259
[3]  
Johannesson M(1997)The friction cost method: a comment J. Health Econ. 16 249-111
[4]  
Karlsson G(2005)The friction-cost method: replacement for nothing and leisure for free? PharmacoEcon. 23 105-1228
[5]  
Brouwer WB(2018)Some adjustments to the human capital and the friction cost methods Eur J Health Econ. 19 1225-778
[6]  
Koopmanschap MA(2018)Friction cost estimates of productivity costs in cost-of-illness studies in comparison with human capital estimates: a review Appl. Health. Econ. Health Policy. 16 765-43
[7]  
Targoutzidis A(2012)Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study Lancet 380 37-450
[8]  
Pike J(2007)Productivity costs associated with cardiometabolic risk factor clusters in the United States Value Health 10 443-304
[9]  
Grosse SD(2019)Productivity burden of smoking in Australia: a life table modelling study Tob. Control. 28 297-319
[10]  
Barnett K(2017)Association between costs related to productivity loss and modified risk factors among users of the brazilian national health system J. Occup. Environ. Med. 59 313-189