Religiosity, CSR Attitudes, and CSR Behavior: An Empirical Study of Executives’ Religiosity and CSR

被引:0
作者
Corrie Mazereeuw-van der Duijn Schouten
Johan Graafland
Muel Kaptein
机构
[1] Tilburg University,Department of Philosophy
[2] Tilburg University,Department of Economics, CentER/Tilburg Sustainability Center/European Banking Center
[3] Erasmus University,Rotterdam School of Management
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2014年 / 123卷
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Executives; Leadership; Religiosity; Stakeholders;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we examine the relationship between Christian religiosity, attitudes towards corporate social responsibility (CSR), and CSR behavior of executives. We distinguish four types of CSR attitudes and five types of CSR behavior. Based on empirical research conducted among 473 Dutch executives, we find that CSR attitudes mediate the influence of religiosity on CSR behavior. Intrinsic religiosity positively affects the ethical CSR attitude and negatively affects the financial CSR attitude, whereas extrinsic religiosity stimulates the philanthropic CSR attitude. Financial, ethical, and philanthropic CSR attitudes significantly affect some types of CSR behaviors. However, because religiosity has opposing effects on the three attitudes, the joint mediation effect of the three attitudes is negligible. Furthermore, we find a direct negative influence of intrinsic religiosity on diversity and a direct positive influence on charity.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 459
页数:22
相关论文
共 258 条
[1]  
Agle BR(1999)God and Mammon: The modern relationship Business Ethics Quarterly 9 563-582
[2]  
Van Buren HJ(1991)The theory of planned behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 179-211
[3]  
Ajzen I(2006)Ethical attitudes of future business leaders: Do they vary by gender and religiosity? Business & Society 45 300-321
[4]  
Albaum G(1967)Personal religious orientation and prejudice Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5 432-443
[5]  
Peterson RA(2004)An exploratory study on the impact of degree of religiousness upon an individual’s corporate social responsiveness orientation Journal of Business Studies 51 119-128
[6]  
Allport GW(1977)Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys Journal of Marketing Research 14 396-402
[7]  
Ross JM(1985)An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability Academy of Management Journal 28 446-463
[8]  
Angelidis J(2005)Diversity and homophily at work: Supportive relations among White and African-American Peers Academy of Management Journal 48 619-644
[9]  
Ibrahim N(2005)A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance Business & Society 44 283-317
[10]  
Armstrong JC(2002)Perceptions of the ethical work climate and covenantal relationships Journal of Business Ethics 36 279-290