Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar

被引:0
作者
Vitor C. Zimmerer
Patricia E. Cowell
Rosemary A. Varley
机构
[1] Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf,Abteilung für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
[2] University of Sheffield,Department of Human Communication Sciences
来源
Memory & Cognition | 2011年 / 39卷
关键词
Syntax; Artificial grammar learning; Individual behavior; Modality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial grammar learning (AGL) is a widely used experimental paradigm that investigates how syntactic structures are processed. After a familiarization phase, participants have to distinguish strings consistent with a set of grammatical rules from strings that violate these rules. Many experiments report performance solely at a group level and as the total number of correct judgments. This report describes a systematic approach for investigating individual performance and a range of different behaviors. Participants were exposed to strings of the nonfinite grammar AnBn. To distinguish grammatical from ungrammatical strings, participants had to pay attention to local dependencies while comparing the number of stimuli from each class. Individual participants showed substantially different behavioral patterns despite exposure to the same stimuli. The results were replicated across auditory and visual sensory modalities. It is suggested that an analysis that looks at individual differences grants new insights into the processes involved in AGL. It also provides a solid basis from which to investigate sequence-processing abilities in special populations, such as patients with neurological lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 501
页数:10
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [11] Knecht S(2001)Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins Cognition 78 B53-106
  • [12] Zwitserlood P(2003)"Artificial grammar learning" in pigeons: a preliminary analysis Learning & Behavior 31 98-1036
  • [13] Dulany DE(2008)Do humans really learn Cognitive Science 32 1021-499
  • [14] Carlson RA(2003) artificial grammars from exemplars? NeuroReport 14 495-236
  • [15] Dewey GI(2007)Training with cognitive sequences improves syntactic comprehension in agrammatic aphasics Synthese 155 211-80
  • [16] Fitch WT(1999)Rule transition on the balance scale task: a case study in belief change Science 283 77-275
  • [17] Hauser MD(1990)Rule learning by seven-month-old infants Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119 264-313
  • [18] Friederici AD(2005)Synthetic grammar learning: implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 307-407
  • [19] Gentner TQ(2004)Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates? Cognitive Science 28 383-236
  • [20] Fenn KM(2005)Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region Cognition 95 201-244