Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar

被引:0
作者
Vitor C. Zimmerer
Patricia E. Cowell
Rosemary A. Varley
机构
[1] Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf,Abteilung für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
[2] University of Sheffield,Department of Human Communication Sciences
来源
Memory & Cognition | 2011年 / 39卷
关键词
Syntax; Artificial grammar learning; Individual behavior; Modality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial grammar learning (AGL) is a widely used experimental paradigm that investigates how syntactic structures are processed. After a familiarization phase, participants have to distinguish strings consistent with a set of grammatical rules from strings that violate these rules. Many experiments report performance solely at a group level and as the total number of correct judgments. This report describes a systematic approach for investigating individual performance and a range of different behaviors. Participants were exposed to strings of the nonfinite grammar AnBn. To distinguish grammatical from ungrammatical strings, participants had to pay attention to local dependencies while comparing the number of stimuli from each class. Individual participants showed substantially different behavioral patterns despite exposure to the same stimuli. The results were replicated across auditory and visual sensory modalities. It is suggested that an analysis that looks at individual differences grants new insights into the processes involved in AGL. It also provides a solid basis from which to investigate sequence-processing abilities in special populations, such as patients with neurological lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 501
页数:10
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Bahlmann J(2008)Hierarchical artificial gprocessing engages Broca's area Neuroimage 42 525-534
  • [2] Schubotz RI(1985)Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia Cognition 21 117-175
  • [3] Friederici AD(1999)Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance Cognitive Science 23 157-205
  • [4] Caplan D(2008)Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: the learnability of embedded hierarchicals Cognition 107 763-774
  • [5] Baker C(1984)A case of syntactical learning and judgment: how conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 541-555
  • [6] Dehaut F(2004)Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate Science 303 377-380
  • [7] Christiansen MH(2004)Processing local transitions versus long-distance syntactic hierarchies Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 245-247
  • [8] Chater N(2006)Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds Nature 440 1204-1207
  • [9] de Vries MH(2007)Evolutionary linguistics: a new look at an old landscape Language Learning and Development 3 101-132
  • [10] Monaghan P(2002)The faculty of language: what is It, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298 1569-1579