Print exposure across the reading life span

被引:0
作者
Lorenz Grolig
Simon P. Tiffin-Richards
Sascha Schroeder
机构
[1] Max Planck Institute for Human Development,Max Planck Research Group Reading Education and Development (REaD)
[2] Department of Education,Department of Psychology
[3] Youth,Department of Educational Psychology
[4] and Family,undefined
[5] University of Würzburg,undefined
[6] University of Göttingen,undefined
来源
Reading and Writing | 2020年 / 33卷
关键词
Author Recognition Test; Explanatory item response analysis; Life span; Print exposure; Reading;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Leisure reading is a main contributor to print exposure, which is in turn related to individual differences in reading and language skills. The Author Recognition Test (ART) is a brief and objective measure of print exposure that has been used in reading research since the 1990s. Life span studies have reported contradicting results concerning age differences in print exposure, possibly due to the use of ART versions that differed regarding authors’ mean publication year. We investigated effects of participant age and authors’ mean publication year, literary level, and circulation frequency on author recognition probability between adolescence and old age (N = 339; age 13–77 years). An explanatory item response analysis showed that participant age and circulation frequency were positively related to recognition probability. Mean publication year was negatively related to recognition probability, indicating that recent authors who have been widely read for only a few years were less often recognized than classic authors who have been widely read for several decades. The relation between participant age and recognition probability was moderated by author variables. For classic authors, the recognition probability increased between adolescence and old age. By contrast, for recent authors, the recognition probability increased only between adolescence and middle age. Our results suggest that the mean publication year is a key author variable for the detection of print exposure differences between young, middle-aged and older adults. We discuss implications for author selection when updating the ART and for measuring print exposure in age-diverse samples.
引用
收藏
页码:1423 / 1441
页数:18
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Acheson DJ(2008)New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students Behavior Research Methods 40 278-289
[2]  
Wells JB(2015)Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 Journal of Statistical Software 67 1-48
[3]  
MacDonald MC(2017)Effects of word predictability and preview lexicality on eye movements during reading: A comparison between young and older adults Psychology and Aging 32 232-242
[4]  
Bates D(2011)The estimation of item response models with the lmer function from the lme4 package in R Journal of Statistical Software 39 1-28
[5]  
Mächler M(2017)Der Titelrekognitionstest für das Vorschulalter (TRT-VS): Erfassung des Lesevolumens von präkonventionellen Lesern und Zusammenhänge mit Vorläuferfertigkeiten des Lesens [Title Recognition Test for Kindergarteners (TRT-VS): Assessment of preconventional readers’ print exposure and its relations to precursors of reading] Diagnostica 63 309-319
[6]  
Bolker B(2015)When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span Psychological Science 26 433-443
[7]  
Walker S(2008)Simultaneous inference in general parametric models Biometrical Journal 50 346-363
[8]  
Choi W(2017)Different stories: How levels of familiarity with literary and genre fiction relate to mentalizing Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 11 474-486
[9]  
Lowder MW(2005)Personality, media preferences, and cultural participation Personality and Individual Differences 38 1675-1688
[10]  
Ferreira F(2016)Adult age differences in information foraging in an interactive reading environment Psychology and Aging 31 211-223