The Effect of Social Cohesion on Subjective Individual Quality of Life in European Countries

被引:0
作者
Gianmaria Bottoni
Felice Addeo
机构
[1] City,
[2] University of London,undefined
[3] Università Degli Studi Di Salerno,undefined
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2024年 / 171卷
关键词
Social cohesion; Quality of life; Multilevel model; European Social Survey;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many scholars have studied the effects of economic conditions on subjective well-being, but scarce attention has been paid to the effect of cultural and social determinants on quality of life. This study aims to analyse the effect of social cohesion considered as a characteristic of a country on subjective quality of life. In addition, we also tested the moderating effect of social cohesion on the relationship between income and placement in society with quality of life. To test our hypotheses we estimated a multilevel regression model. First, we estimated the null model, which showed that almost a quarter of the variance in quality of life is located at country level. Second, we included in the model all the level-1 predictors. This model highlighted that self-evaluated position on the social ladder has a larger positive effect than income on quality of life. In the third step, we added country-level predictors. Controlling for other macro factors—GDP, Life Expectancy, Gini coefficient and Homicide rate—and individual-level variables, we shows that Cohesion exerts a positive effect on subjective quality of life. The model also points out that country’s economic conditions (measured by GDP) do not affect quality of life when we control this relationship for social cohesion. Interestingly, also the within-country economic disparities (measured by Gini coefficient) do not seem to affect quality of life when cohesion is taken into account. Finally, we also shows that the positive effect of income on quality of life is moderated by cohesion. In other words, income is a relatively less important factor in determining quality of life in countries with higher levels of cohesion. In the same way, individuals’ position and perception of their placement on the social ladder affects in a lesser extent their quality of life in those countries that have higher degrees of cohesion.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1133
页数:22
相关论文
共 117 条
  • [21] Schmidt P(2004)Social cohesion and living conditions in the Canadian Arctic: From theory to measurement Social Indicators Research 66 295-22468
  • [22] Meuleman B(2001)Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory The Economic Journal 111 465-435
  • [23] Davidov E(2010)The happiness–income paradox revisited Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 22463-425
  • [24] Meuleman B(2002)What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature 40 402-27
  • [25] Cieciuch J(2004)Social cohesion Annual Review of Sociology 30 409-641
  • [26] Schmidt P(2003)Wealth and happiness revisited–growing national income does go with greater happiness Social Indicators Research 64 1-282
  • [27] Billiet J(1998)Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations Journal of Management 24 623-83
  • [28] Delhey J(2013)A test for cluster bias: Detecting violations of measurement invariance across clusters in multilevel data Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 20 265-230
  • [29] Dragolov G(2011)Social cohesion as a real-life phenomenon: Assessing the explanatory power of the universalist and particularist perspectives Social Indicators Research 100 61-16493
  • [30] Dickes P(1996)Indicator and stratification methods for missing explanatory variables in multiple linear regression Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 222-21