Leadership meta-skills in public institutions

被引:0
作者
Marika Tammeaid
Petri Virtanen
Jens Meyer
机构
[1] Itla Children’s Foundation, Porkkalankatu 24, Helsinki
[2] University of Vaasa, Itla Children’s Foundation, Porkkalankatu 24, Helsinki
[3] INSEAD Europe Campus, Boulevard de Constance, Fontainebleau
来源
SN Business & Economics | / 2卷 / 7期
关键词
Leadership development; Learning; Meta-skills; Public institutions; Training;
D O I
10.1007/s43546-022-00262-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper maintains that public institutions’ and public leaders’ role is important in providing the conditions for reasonable living and guaranteeing accountable spending of public resources. The paper explores the idea of meta-skills as a new leadership concept. It focuses on meta-skills particularly from the perspective of meta-governance, distributive leadership, and metacognition. Meta-skill capacity involves the ability to use overarching skills to learn other skills and proactively engage others in skill development and new learning. Meta-skills of learning to learn, harnessing thinking skills, and putting lessons learned into practice are brought up as universal meta-skills important for all public sector leaders despite branch of government and at the same time largely neglected in research on public leadership. The paper reflects the learnings from an empirical case of a long leadership training program conducted in Finland and discusses enablers and hindrances to public sector leadership meta-skills development and concludes that the role of leadership training should be re-thought—to enable structural and mental boundary crossing which is an elemental part and ingredient of any successful and effective leadership development practice. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Al Taji F.N.A., Bengo I., The distinctive managerial challenges of hybrid organizations: which skills are required?, J Soc Entrepreneurship, 10, 3, pp. 328-345, (2019)
[2]  
Ansell C., Geyer R., ‘Pragmatic complexity’ a new foundation for moving beyond ‘evidence-based policy making’?, Policy Stud, 38, 2, pp. 149-167, (2016)
[3]  
Ansell C.K., Trondal J., Ogard M., Governance in turbulent times, (2017)
[4]  
Baker M., O'Brien W., Rethinking outdoor leadership: an investigation of affective abilities in Australian higher education curriculum, J Adv Educ Outdoor Learn, 20, 3, pp. 202-216, (2019)
[5]  
Batory A., Svensson S., The use and abuse of participatory governance by populist governments, Policy Polit, 47, 2, pp. 227-244, (2019)
[6]  
Billing D., Generic cognitive abilities in higher Education: an international analysis of skills sought by stakeholders, Compare: J Compar Int Educ, 33, 3, pp. 335-350, (2003)
[7]  
Boin A., Christensen T., The development of public institutions: reconsidering the role of leadership, Admin Soc, 40, 3, pp. 271-297, (2008)
[8]  
Bolden R., Distributed leadership in organizations: a review of theory and research, Int J Manag Rev, 31, 3, pp. 251-269, (2011)
[9]  
Bouckaert G., Van Dooren W., Performance measurement and management in public sector organizations, Public Management and Governance, pp. 151-164, (2009)
[10]  
Bourdieu P., The logic of practice, (1990)