Anatomic modeling using 3D printing: Quality assurance and optimization

被引:65
作者
Leng, Shuai [1 ]
McGee, Kiaran [1 ]
Morris, Jonathan [1 ]
Alexander, Amy [1 ]
Kuhlmann, Joel [2 ]
Vrieze, Thomas [1 ]
McCollough, Cynthia H. [1 ]
Matsumoto, Jane [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester,MN,55901, United States
[2] Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester,MN,55901, United States
关键词
Image segmentation - Application programs - Data acquisition - Medical imaging - Quality assurance - 3D modeling - Printing presses - 3D printers - Computerized tomography;
D O I
10.1186/s41205-017-0014-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study is to provide a framework for the development of a quality assurance (QA) program for use in medical 3D printing applications. An interdisciplinary QA team was built with expertise from all aspects of 3D printing. A systematic QA approach was established to assess the accuracy and precision of each step during the 3D printing process, including: image data acquisition, segmentation and processing, and 3D printing and cleaning. Validation of printed models was performed by qualitative inspection and quantitative measurement. The latter was achieved by scanning the printed model with a high resolution CT scanner to obtain images of the printed model, which were registered to the original patient images and the distance between them was calculated on a point-by-point basis. Results: A phantom-based QA process, with two QA phantoms, was also developed. The phantoms went through the same 3D printing process as that of the patient models to generate printed QA models. Physical measurement, fit tests, and image based measurements were performed to compare the printed 3D model to the original QA phantom, with its known size and shape, providing an end-to-end assessment of errors involved in the complete 3D printing process. Measured differences between the printed model and the original QA phantom ranged from -0.32 mm to 0.13 mm for the line pair pattern. For a radial-ulna patient model, the mean distance between the original data set and the scanned printed model was -0.12 mm (ranging from -0.57 to 0.34 mm), with a standard deviation of 0.17 mm. Conclusions: A comprehensive QA process from image acquisition to completed model has been developed. Such a program is essential to ensure the required accuracy of 3D printed models for medical applications. © The Author(s) 2017.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Koeck FX(2011)Evaluation of implant position and knee alignment after patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Knee 18 294-299
[2]  
Morrison RJ(2015)Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients Sci Transl Med 7 285ra64-2045
[3]  
Zopf DA(2013)Bioresorbable airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer N Engl J Med 368 2043-1988
[4]  
Mitsouras D(2015)Medical 3d printing for the radiologist Radiographics 35 1965-9
[5]  
Marro A(2016)Three-dimensional printing and medical imaging: a review of the methods and applications Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 45 2-2214
[6]  
Bandukwala T(2014)The shape of things to come: 3D printing in medicine JAMA 312 2213-718
[7]  
Mak W(2016)Applications of 3D printing in cardiovascular diseases Nat Rev Cardiol 13 701-6
[8]  
Michalski MH(2015)Additively manufactured medical products–the FDA perspective 3D Print Med 2 1-36
[9]  
Ross JS(2016)3D printing based on cardiac CT assists anatomic visualization prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10 28-221
[10]  
Giannopoulos AA(2015)3D Printing in Medicine: an introductory message from the Editor-in-Chief 3D Print Med 1 1-153