Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving

被引:0
作者
Merritt Polk
机构
[1] The University of Gothenburg,Human Ecology, School of Global Studies
[2] Chalmers University of Technology,Mistra Urban Futures
来源
Sustainability Science | 2014年 / 9卷
关键词
Transdisciplinary research; Sustainability; Symmetrical participation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transdisciplinarity is often presented as a way to effectively use scientific research to contribute to societal problem solving for sustainability. The aim of this paper is to critically explore this statement. This is done in two ways. First, a literature survey of transdisciplinary research is used to identify the assumptions that underlie the positive relationship between transdisciplinarity and societal problem solving for sustainability. This mapping identifies the claim that in-depth participation of users and the integration of relevant knowledge from both practice and research in real-world problem contexts produce socially robust results that contribute to sustainability. Second, the ability to live up to this claim is presented and discussed in five case study projects from Mistra Urban Futures, a transdisciplinary center in Göteborg, Sweden. The conclusions show that transdisciplinary processes, which fulfill the above conditions, do produce different types of socially robust knowledge, but this does not necessarily result in the ability to influence change in a sustainable direction. This instead creates a paradox in that the participation of stakeholders and the integration of knowledge from diverse sources require spaces that are both embedded in and insulated from practice and science proper. Such spaces produce results that are not easily aligned with sector-based target groups and formal policy processes. Institutionalizing transdisciplinarity in a boundary organization therefore solves some problems regarding participation and balanced problem ownership. However, it also creates new, hybrid problems, regarding knowledge transfer and scalability, which bridge the boundaries and challenge the praxis of planning and policy making.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 451
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Blackstock KL(2007)Operationalising sustainability science for a sustainability directive? Reflecting on three pilot projects Geogr J 173 343-357
[2]  
Carter CE(2007)Devloping and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainbility Ecol Econ 60 726-742
[3]  
Blackstock KL(2004)Sustainable development: mainstream and critical perspectives Organ Environ 17 195-225
[4]  
Kelly GJ(1993)Science for the post-normal age Futures 25 739-755
[5]  
Horsey BL(2003)Boundary construction in science: from discourse to construction Sci Public Policy 30 235-238
[6]  
Castro C(2005)Sustainable development: mapping different approaches Sustain Dev 13 38-52
[7]  
Funtowicz S(2005)What is sustainble development: goals, indicators, values and practice Environment 47 9-21
[8]  
Ravetz J(2012)Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles and challenges Sustain Sci 7 25-43
[9]  
Hellström T(2010)Researchers roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal Sci Public Policy 37 267-281
[10]  
Jacob M(2010)Sustainability in practice: the interpretation of sustainable development in a regional planning arena for dialogue and learning in Western Sweden Planning. Theory Pract 11 473-489