Reconstructing Metaphorical Meaning

被引:0
作者
Fabrizio Macagno
Benedetta Zavatta
机构
[1] Universidade Nova de Lisboa,Institute of Philosophy of Language (IFL)
来源
Argumentation | 2014年 / 28卷
关键词
Metaphor; Relevance; Interpretation; Pragmatics; Argumentation; Argumentation schemes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Metaphorical meaning can be analyzed as triggered by an apparent communicative breach, an incongruity that leads to a default of the presumptive interpretation of a vehicle. This breach can be solved through contextual renegotiations of meaning guided by the communicative intention, or rather the presumed purpose of the metaphorical utterance. This paper addresses the problem of analyzing the complex process of reasoning underlying the reconstruction of metaphorical meaning. This process will be described as a type of abductive argument, aimed at explaining how the vehicle can best contribute to the purpose of the utterance. This type of reasoning involves the analysis of the possible predicates that can be and usually are attributed to the vehicle, and the selection of the one (or ones) that can support the implicit conclusion constituting the communicative goal of the metaphorical utterance. Metaphorical meaning, in this perspective, becomes the outcome of a complex process of meaning reconstruction aimed at providing the best explanation of the function of the vehicle within a discourse move.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 488
页数:35
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Antley Kenneth(1974)McCawley’s theory of selectional restriction Foundations of Language 11 257-272
[2]  
Black Max(1954)Metaphor Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series 55 273-294
[3]  
Ducrot Oswald(1966)Le roi de France est sage. Implication logique et Présupposition linguistique Études de linguistique appliquée 4 39-47
[4]  
Glucksberg Sam(1990)Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity Psychological Review 97 3-18
[5]  
Keysar Boaz(1986)Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse Computational Linguistics 12 175-204
[6]  
Grosz Barbara(1965)The inference to the best explanation The Philosophical Review 74 88-95
[7]  
Sidnert Candace(1979)Coherence and coreference Cognitive science 3 67-90
[8]  
Harman Gilbert(1981)How to do things without words: The taken for granted as speech action Communication Quarterly 29 228-236
[9]  
Hobbs Jerry(2003)A perspective on judgment and choice American Psychologist 58 697-720
[10]  
Hopper Robert(1963)The structure of a semantic theory Language 39 170-210