Optimization of a contrast-detail-based method for electronic image display quality evaluation

被引:0
作者
Nicholas J. Hangiandreou
Kenneth A. Fetterly
Joel P. Felmlee
机构
[1] Mayo Clinic and Foundation,Department of Diagnostic Radiology
来源
Journal of Digital Imaging | 1999年 / 12卷
关键词
contrast-detail experiments; electronic image display; image quality evaluation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The authors previously reported a general technique based on contrast-detail methods to provide an overall quantitative evaluation of electronic image display quality. The figure-of-merit reflecting overall display quality is called maximum threshold contrast or MTC. In this work we have optimized the MTC technique through improvements in both the test images and the figure-of-merit computation. The test images were altered to match the average luminance with that observed for clinical computed radiographic images. The figure-of-merit calculation was altered to allow for contrast-detail data with slopes not equal to −1. Preliminary experiments also were conducted to demonstrate the response of the MTC measurements to increased noise in the displayed image. MTC measurements were obtained from five observers using the improved test images displayed with maximum monitor luminance settings of 30-, 50-, and 70-ft-Lamberts. Similar measurements were obtained from two observers using test images altered by the addition of a low level of image noise. The noise-free MTC and MTC difference measurements exhibited standard deviations of 0.77 and 1.55, respectively. This indicates good measurement precision, comparable or superior to that observed using the earlier MTC technique. No statistically significant image quality differences versus maximum monitor luminance were seen. The noise-added MTC measurements were greater than the noise-free values by an average of 4.08 pixel values, and this difference was statistically significant. This response is qualitatively correct, and is judged to indicate good sensitivity of the MTC measurement to increased noise levels.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Launders JH(1998)A comprehensive physical image quality evaluation of a selenium based digital x-ray imaging system for thorax radiography Med Phys 25 986-997
  • [2] Kengyelics SM(1979)The use of contrast-detail-dose evaluation of image quality in a computed tomographic scanner J Comput Assist Tomogr 3 189-195
  • [3] Cowen AR(1991)Contrast, resolution and detectability in MR imaging J Comput Assist Tomogr 15 297-303
  • [4] Cohen G(1992)Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: Implications for chest radiography Radiology 183 179-187
  • [5] DiBianca FA(1998)Quantitative evaluation of overall electronic display quality J Digit Imaging 11 180-186
  • [6] Constable RT(1995)Observer performance comparison of digital radiographic systems for stereotactic breast needle biopsy Acta Radiol 2 116-122
  • [7] Henkelman RM(1997)Picture archive and communication system implementation in a community medicine practice J Digit Imaging 10 36-37
  • [8] Dobbins JT(1948)The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale J Soc Opt Am 38 196-208
  • [9] Rice JJ(1985)Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems Phys Med Biol 30 489-518
  • [10] Beam CA(1998)Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of medical images Med Phys 25 1132-1138