The Working Mechanisms of Parental Involvement in Interventions for Children with Chronic Illness

被引:0
作者
Agnes M. Willemen
Erika Kuzminskaite
Heleen Maurice-Stam
Martha A. Grootenhuis
Bob F. Last
Carlo Schuengel
Linde Scholten
机构
[1] Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Department of Clinical Child and Family Studies and Amsterdam Public Health
[2] Amsterdam UMC,Department of Psychiatry
[3] Location VUmc,Princess Maxima Centre for Pediatric Oncology
[4] University Medical Center,Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Pediatric Psychosocial Department
[5] University of Amsterdam,undefined
来源
Journal of Child and Family Studies | 2022年 / 31卷
关键词
Chronic illness; Internalizing problems; Parental involvement; Mediation; Randomized controlled trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Children with chronic illness (CI) are at risk for internalizing problems, which reduce their quality of life, hamper treatment, and increase family stress. Accordingly, behavioral interventions are provided at the family level. However, the effects of parental involvement on child outcomes are not consistently beneficial. Therefore, it is relevant to study the working mechanisms. In the present study, we tested child coping and parenting stress as underlying mechanisms of the effect of an intervention for children and an additional group intervention for parents. Data were analyzed from a randomized controlled trial. Families of children with chronic illness (N = 120, child M age = 12.11 years, range 7.98–18.07) participated in a cognitive-behavioral-based group intervention and were randomized in the child-only intervention or parent–child intervention. Primary outcomes were parent- and child-reported internalizing problems, whereas the mediators were the use of child active coping skills and parenting stress. The causal model was tested with multilevel mediation analysis. Active coping skills and parenting stress stood out as significant mediators of the effect of the intervention on parent- and child-reported internalizing behavior (Cohen’s d effect size range 0.29–1.57). When parents were involved in the intervention, children increased their use of active coping skills and parents decreased in parenting stress, which in turn improved child internalizing problems. Knowing that coping skills and parenting stress underlie the benefit of involving parents can be used for optimizing interventions for children with CI and addressing the risk of internalizing problems.
引用
收藏
页码:3037 / 3046
页数:9
相关论文
共 148 条
  • [11] Hall N(2020)Conditional process analysis: Concepts, computation, and advances in the modeling of the contingencies of mechanisms American Behavioral Scientist 64 37-435
  • [12] Majnemer A(2019)The future of intervention science: process-based therapy Clinical Psychological Science 7 1389-24
  • [13] Shevell MI(2006)Depressive symptoms in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes Diabetes Care 29 427-38
  • [14] Law M(2000)Informant agreement in behavior ratings for children with epilepsy Epilepsy and Behavior 1 15-90
  • [15] Poulin C(2007)Psychotherapy of childhood anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 76 30-65
  • [16] Rosenbaum P(2017)Stress and coping predict adjustment and glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes Annals of Behavioral Medicine 51 83-241
  • [17] Bruijniks SJ(2008)Adaptive style and differences in parent and child report of health‐related quality of life in children with cancer Psycho‐oncology 17 50-57
  • [18] Meeter M(2006)Meta-analysis of therapeutic relationship variables in youth and family therapy: The evidence for different relationship variables in the child and adolescent treatment outcome literature Clinical Psychology Review 26 229-112
  • [19] Lemmens LH(2010)The effects of a parent-focused intervention for children with a recent diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder on a parenting stress and competence Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 4 43-918
  • [20] Peeters F(2018)Cognitive-behavior therapy for children and adolescents with anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis of secondary outcomes Journal of Anxiety Disorders 60 101-20