Semen preparation methods and sperm telomere length: density gradient centrifugation versus the swim up procedure

被引:0
作者
Feifei Zhao
Qingling Yang
Senlin Shi
Xiaoyan Luo
Yingpu Sun
机构
[1] Reproductive Medical Center,
[2] First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 6卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous studies have shown that both density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and swim up (SU) procedures can select spermatozoa with longer telomeres for assisted reproduction techniques (ART). However, it is unknown which approach is more effective. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of these two methods on sperm telomere length (STL). A total of 150 normozoospermic subjects were recruited. STL, DNA fragmentation index (DFI), reactive oxygen species (ROS) content and progressive motility of semen samples were detected before and after the procedures of DGC and SU. When compared to raw semen, the average length of sperm telomeres was significantly longer after the two sperm preparation methods. However, no significant difference was found between the DGC and SU procedures. We also found that semen prepared by the two methods had lower DNA fragmentation, ROS content and sperm progressive motility. However, no significant difference was found in those parameters between the two procedures. This is the first study that compares the effects of the DGC and SU procedures on STL, and the results show that both methods can recover a sperm population with longer STL and better DNA integrity for ART.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [1] Bungum M(2004)The predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters for the outcome of intrauterine insemination, IVF and ICSI Hum. Reprod. 19 1401-1408
  • [2] Borini A(2006)Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART Hum. Reprod. 21 2876-2881
  • [3] Carrell DT(2003)Sperm DNA fragmentation is increased in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss Arch. Androl. 49 49-55
  • [4] Duran EH(2002)Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study Hum. Reprod 17 3122-3128
  • [5] Morshedi M(1999)Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic Hum. Reprod 14 1039-1049
  • [6] Taylor S(2004)Extent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after Fertil. Steril. 82 378-383
  • [7] Oehninger S(2008) fertilization Fertil. Steril. 90 1792-1799
  • [8] Evenson DP(2008)Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as assessed by the sperm chromatin dispersion test in assisted reproductive technology programs: results of a large prospective multicenter study Hum. Reprod. 23 2663-2668
  • [9] Seli E(2005)A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis Genes Dev. 19 2100-2110
  • [10] Gardner DK(2014)Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres PLoS One 9 e110963-303