Expert finding in community question answering: a review

被引:0
作者
Sha Yuan
Yu Zhang
Jie Tang
Wendy Hall
Juan Bautista Cabotà
机构
[1] Tsinghua University,Knowledge Engineering Lab, Department of Computer Science and Technology
[2] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Institute of Medical Information, Peking Union Medical College
[3] University of Valencia,Computer Science Department
[4] University of Southampton,Electronics and Computer Science
来源
Artificial Intelligence Review | 2020年 / 53卷
关键词
Expert finding; Matrix factorization; Deep learning; Ensemble learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The rapid development of Community Question Answering (CQA) satisfies users’ quest for professional and personal knowledge about anything. In CQA, one central issue is to find users with expertise and willingness to answer the given questions. Expert finding in CQA often exhibits very different challenges compared to traditional methods. The new features of CQA (such as huge volume, sparse data and crowdsourcing) violate fundamental assumptions of traditional recommendation systems. This paper focuses on reviewing and categorizing the current progress on expert finding in CQA. We classify the recent solutions into four different categories: matrix factorization based models (MF-based models), gradient boosting tree based models (GBT-based models), deep learning based models (DL-based models) and ranking based models (R-based models). We find that MF-based models outperform other categories of models in the crowdsourcing situation. Moreover, we use innovative diagrams to clarify several important concepts of ensemble learning, and find that ensemble models with several specific single models can further boost the performance. Further, we compare the performance of different models on different types of matching tasks, including textvs.text, graphvs.text, audiovs.text and videovs.text. The results will help the model selection of expert finding in practice. Finally, we explore some potential future issues in expert finding research in CQA.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 874
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Automatic Question-Answering in Chinese Medical Q & A Community with Knowledge Graph
    Wang Y.
    Yu W.
    Chen J.
    Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2023, 7 (03) : 97 - 109
  • [42] A question-entailment approach to question answering
    Asma Ben Abacha
    Dina Demner-Fushman
    BMC Bioinformatics, 20
  • [43] Question action relevance and editing for visual question answering
    Toor, Andeep S.
    Wechsler, Harry
    Nappi, Michele
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 78 (03) : 2921 - 2935
  • [44] Question action relevance and editing for visual question answering
    Andeep S. Toor
    Harry Wechsler
    Michele Nappi
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2019, 78 : 2921 - 2935
  • [45] Relevant Question Answering in Community Based Networks Using Deep LSTM Neural Networks
    Karimi, Elaheh
    Majidi, Babak
    Manzuri, Mohammad Taghi
    2019 7TH IRANIAN JOINT CONGRESS ON FUZZY AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (CFIS), 2019, : 36 - 40
  • [46] Multiple answers to a question: a new approach for visual question answering
    Hosseinabad, Sayedshayan Hashemi
    Safayani, Mehran
    Mirzaei, Abdolreza
    VISUAL COMPUTER, 2021, 37 (01) : 119 - 131
  • [47] Video Question Answering by Frame Attention
    Fang, Jiannan
    Sun, Lingling
    Wang, Yaqi
    ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING (ICDIP 2019), 2019, 11179
  • [48] Towards Multilingual Neural Question Answering
    Loginova, Ekaterina
    Varanasi, Stalin
    Neumann, Guenter
    NEW TRENDS IN DATABASES AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ADBIS 2018, 2018, 909 : 274 - 285
  • [49] Affective Visual Question Answering Network
    Ruwa, Nelson
    Mao, Qirong
    Wang, Liangjun
    Dong, Ming
    IEEE 1ST CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION PROCESSING AND RETRIEVAL (MIPR 2018), 2018, : 170 - 173
  • [50] Distributed Deep Learning for Question Answering
    Feng, Minwei
    Xiang, Bing
    Zhou, Bowen
    CIKM'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 ACM CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2016, : 2413 - 2416