Numerical Studies on the Performance of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Walls Filled with Marginal Soil

被引:0
作者
Mainak Majumder
Srinivasan Venkatraman
Monit Bheda
Mayuresh Patil
机构
[1] L&T Construction,Engineering Research Manager, Research and Development Department
[2] Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
Indian Geotechnical Journal | 2023年 / 53卷
关键词
GRS wall; Marginal soil; Drainage; Geogrid; Wall displacement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper is to investigate the performance of geosynthetic reinforced soil (earth) wall, popularly known as GRS walls, backfilled with the marginal soil. Over the years, granular soil has been predominantly used as the backfill material owing to its high strength, good drainage characteristics and easily compactable. However, due to lack of availability, transportation issues, granular soil is not abundant in many of highway project site. Marginal soil can be defined as the percentage fines greater than fifteen percent or having plasticity index more than 6. Poor drainage and low shear strength and development of pore water pressure due to presence of fines are major design constraints in using marginal soil as the GRS wall backfill. The present research compares the performance of marginal backfill with clean granular soil using numerical analysis. For this purpose, a two-dimensional finite element model has been developed to study the performance of GRS wall under dry-state conditions. Further parametric study has been carried out to study the effect of surcharge, reinforcement length, spacing, wall facings, and wall height. The wall displacement has been considered as the major performance criteria. Based on the analyses, it has been found that marginal soil can be used as backfill, provided higher strength of geogrid has been used. A real-life case study has been analyzed for different heights of GRS wall sections to understand the deformation behavior of the wall by using marginal fills.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 826
页数:21
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Wilkins T(2017)Briefing: BS 8006–1: a major amendment for 2016 Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 143 04017056-56
[2]  
Worrall K(2015)Laboruntersuchungen zum materialverhalten von tonbeton Bautechnik 8 45-912
[3]  
Smith R(1998)Seismic response analysis of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall Geosynth Int 46 904-27
[4]  
Becker A(2017)Resilience of MSE walls with marginal backfill under a changing climate: quantitative assessment for extreme precipitation events J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 40 20-226
[5]  
Vrettos C(2016)Role of suction stress on service state behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures Transport Geotech 3 211-1548
[6]  
Bathurst RJ(2018)An extended data base and recommendations regarding 320 failed geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls Geotext Geomembr 132 1538-802
[7]  
Hatami K(2013)A data base, statistics and recommendations regarding 171 failed geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls Geotext Geomembr 26 793-226
[8]  
Vahedifard F(2017)Effect of infiltration on the performance of an unsaturated geotextile-reinforced soil wall Geotext Geomembr 45 211-824
[9]  
Tehrani FS(2007)Field monitoring evaluation of geotextile-reinforced soil-retaining walls Geosynth Int 50 807-566
[10]  
Galavi V(2006)Case history of geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall failure J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 9 525-439