Serum anti-Müllerian hormone predicts ovarian response and cycle outcome in IVF patients

[1] Ravhon A(2000)Dynamic assays of inhibin B and oestradiol following buserelin acetate administration as predictors of ovarian response in IVF Hum Reprod 15 2297-301

[2] Lavery S(2002)Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve Fertil Steril 77 328-36

[3] Michael S(2006)A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome Hum Reprod Updat 12 685-718

[4] Donaldson M(1997)Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response Hum Reprod 12 294-7

[5] Margara R(2004)Ovarian reserve and reproductive age may be determined from measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography Hum Reprod 19 1612-7

[6] Trew G(1998)Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies Fertil Steril 69 505-10

[7] Winston R(2005)Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level Fertil Steril 83 291-301

[8] Bancsi LF(2005)Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology? BJOG 112 1384-90

[9] Broekmans FJ(2002)Early follicular serum mullerian-inhibiting substance levels are associated with ovarian response during assisted reproductive technology cycles Fertil Steril 77 468-71

[10] Eijkemans MJ(2002)Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve Hum Reprod 17 3065-71

[1] Ravhon A(2000)Dynamic assays of inhibin B and oestradiol following buserelin acetate administration as predictors of ovarian response in IVF Hum Reprod 15 2297-301

[2] Lavery S(2002)Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve Fertil Steril 77 328-36

[3] Michael S(2006)A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome Hum Reprod Updat 12 685-718

[4] Donaldson M(1997)Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response Hum Reprod 12 294-7

[5] Margara R(2004)Ovarian reserve and reproductive age may be determined from measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography Hum Reprod 19 1612-7

[6] Trew G(1998)Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies Fertil Steril 69 505-10

[7] Winston R(2005)Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level Fertil Steril 83 291-301

[8] Bancsi LF(2005)Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology? BJOG 112 1384-90

[9] Broekmans FJ(2002)Early follicular serum mullerian-inhibiting substance levels are associated with ovarian response during assisted reproductive technology cycles Fertil Steril 77 468-71

[10] Eijkemans MJ(2002)Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve Hum Reprod 17 3065-71