Trade openness and green total factor productivity: testing the role of environment regulation based on dynamic panel threshold model

被引:0
作者
Qinghua Huang
Min Liu
机构
[1] Southwest University,College of Economics & Management
来源
Environment, Development and Sustainability | 2022年 / 24卷
关键词
Trade openness; Environmental regulation; Green total factor productivity; Yangtze River economic belt; Panel threshold model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As an ecological barrier to ensure the high-quality development of China’s economy, the Yangtze River Economic Belt has attracted more and more attention from academic circles on how to promote the green development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. This paper uses the SBM directional distance function and the Malmquist–Luenberger index to measure the green total factor productivity of 110 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2006 to 2018, and then based on the panel threshold model to empirically explore the intensity of environmental regulations that induce trade openness and promote green total factor productivity. Studies have shown that: Firstly, trade openness has significantly inhibited the increase in green total factor productivity, but environmental regulations can play a positive regulatory role, that is increasing the intensity of environmental regulation can alleviate the adverse effects of trade openness, and it is mainly to improve the adverse effects by promoting the progress of green technology. Secondly, the results of the panel threshold model show that environmental regulations have a nonlinear regulatory effect on trade openness and green total factor productivity. When the intensity of environmental regulations crosses the second threshold, trade openness has a significant positive effect on the impact of green total factor productivity. Finally, the heterogeneity results show that in order to reverse the adverse impact of trade openness on green total factor productivity, the upper, middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt should formulate relatively strict environmental regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:9304 / 9329
页数:25
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Ayamba EC(2019)An empirical model on the impact of foreign direct investment on China’s environmental pollution: Analysis based on simultaneous equations Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 16239-16248
  • [2] Haibo C(2008)Technical change and the marginal cost of abatement Energy Economics 30 2799-2816
  • [3] Musah AA(2016)Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China Journal of Development Economics 123 73-85
  • [4] Ruth A(2017)Opening up, international trade, and green technology progress Journal of Cleaner Production 142 1002-1012
  • [5] Osei-Agyemang A(2010)Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency: Some clarifications European Journal of Operational Research 206 702-287
  • [6] Baker E(2010)A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 43 274-116
  • [7] Clarke L(1999)Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 83-368
  • [8] Shittu E(1999)Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference Journal of Econometrics 93 345-69
  • [9] Cai X(2018)Environmental regulation, foreign direct investment and green technological progress—Evidence from Chinese manufacturing industries International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15 221-878
  • [10] Lu Y(2019)Environmental regulation intensity, foreign direct investment, and green technology spillover—An empirical study Sustainability 11 2718-33