Residential Out-of-Home Care Staff Perceptions of Implementing a Trauma-Informed Approach: The Sanctuary Model

被引:0
作者
Emma Galvin
Renee O’Donnell
Julie Avery
Heather Morris
Aya Mousa
Nick Halfpenny
Robyn Miller
Helen Skouteris
机构
[1] Monash University,Health and Social Care Unit (HSCU), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
[2] Monash University,Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
[3] MacKillop Family Services,School of Business
[4] Warwick University,undefined
来源
Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
Implementation; Evaluation; Out-of-home care; Residential care staff; Trauma-informed care;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to explore and better understand the enablers and barriers of implementation and how these impact on the organisational successes and challenges of adopting The Sanctuary Model, as perceived by residential care staff. Following ethics approval, three semi-structured interviews and six focus groups were conducted with residential care staff between February and July, 2020. Participants identified a number of enablers, presented in the subthemes: (a) social support systems and resources; (b) shared trauma-informed knowledge and understanding; and (c) leadership and champions. These enablers influenced organisational successes in adopting: (a) the Sanctuary Commitments; (b) the S.E.L.F Framework; (c) Reflective Practice and Supervision; and (d) Trauma Theory. A number of barriers hindering implementation were identified. These were reflected in the subthemes: (a) informal practice; (b) lack of practice-based training; (c) poor introduction to young people; and (d) resources. These barriers impacted on organisational challenges faced in residential out-of-home care including: (a) The Sanctuary Model Toolkit and (b) young people’s behaviour and engagement. Comparisons from this study and previous findings identified by executive and upper management staff (decision makers) are discussed. Key findings indicate that when implementing, sustaining and embedding The Sanctuary Model, organisations need to become trauma-informed rather than ‘do’ trauma-informed care and organisations need to “live and breathe” The Sanctuary Model Commitments, be connected and inclusive of one another, use trauma-informed language and feel safe.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 667
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Aarons GA(2014)Aligning leadership across systems and organizations to develop a strategic climate for evidence-based practice implementation Annual Review of Public Health 35 255-274
[2]  
Ehrhart MG(2017)As the world becomes trauma–informed, work to do Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 18 131-138
[3]  
Farahnak LR(2013)Trauma-informed care in child welfare: an imperative for residential childcare workers Restoring sanctuary: A new operating system for trauma-informed systems of care. 7 154-165
[4]  
Sklar M(2020)Risking connection trauma training: a pathway toward trauma-informed care in child congregate care settings International Journal of Child and Adolescent Resilience 4 507-515
[5]  
Becker-Blease KA(2012)Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation Psychological trauma 41 327-350
[6]  
Bloom SL(2008)Compassion fatigue risk and self-care practices among residential treatment center childcare workers Am J Community Psychol 25 103-122
[7]  
Farragher B(2008)The Sanctuary Model: Theoretical Framework Residential Treatment for Children & Youth 94 119-134
[8]  
Brend D(2014)Are we there yet? data saturation in qualitative research Families in Society 20 1408-1416
[9]  
Sprang G(2015)A critical look at trauma-informed care among agencies and systems serving maltreated youth and their families Qualitative Report 21 95-100
[10]  
Brown SM(2016)Development and implementation of trauma-informed programming in youth residential treatment centers using the ARC framework Child Maltreat 28 679-692