Feedback 2.0 in online writing instruction: Combining audio-visual and text-based commentary to enhance student revision and writing competency

被引:0
作者
Anna Grigoryan
机构
[1] Abilene Christian University,
来源
Journal of Computing in Higher Education | 2017年 / 29卷
关键词
Online learning; Feedback; Online writing instruction; Audio-visual feedback; Feedback in online learning environments; Writing instruction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The continued increase in the number of students participating in online degree programs has led to an increase in the number of students taking online composition courses. Currently, most online writing programs replicate approaches used in face-to-face composition courses and simply transfer them to the online learning environment. However, there is a need to develop teaching practices and approaches to feedback designed specifically for online learning environments. This quasi-experimental study examined whether the use of a combination of audio-visual and text-based commentary in online writing courses was more effective in promoting substantive revision and improvement in students’ writing than the use of text-based commentary alone. The multimodal feedback group showed higher rates of improvement in areas of audience and purpose between first and final drafts than students in the text-only group. Results also indicated that receiving a combination of audio-visual and text-based feedback had a marginally statistically significant effect on categories of content (p = .08) and final draft quality (p = .06); the effect for both categories was considered medium, partial η2 = .07. While most previous studies on audio or video feedback have focused on student perceptions of the feedback, this study, by focusing on efficacy, has helped generate empirical data regarding the pedagogical usefulness of audiovisual feedback in online learning environments.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 476
页数:25
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Anson CM(2016)Students’ perceptions of oral screencast responses to their writing exploring digitally mediated identities Journal of Business and Technical Communication 30 378-411
[2]  
Dannels DP(1980)Revising processes in twelfth grade students’ transactional writing Research in the Teaching of English 14 197-222
[3]  
Laboy JI(2014)Academic literacy development: Does video commentary feedback lead to greater engagement and response than conventional written feedback? The International Journal of Literacies 20 19-38
[4]  
Carneiro L(2010)Student revision with peer and expert reviewing Learning and Instruction 20 328-338
[5]  
Bridwell LS(1993)Teachers’ rhetorical comments on student papers College Composition and Communication 44 200-223
[6]  
Cavaleri M(1981)Analyzing revision College Composition and Communication 32 400-414
[7]  
Di Biase B(1987)Research on revision in writing Review of Educational Research 57 481-506
[8]  
Kawaguchi S(2017)Audiovisual commentary as a way to reduce transactional distance and increase teaching presence in online writing instruction: Student perceptions and preferences Journal of Response to Writing 3 83-128
[9]  
Cho K(1987)The effects of word processing the revision strategies of college freshmen Research in the Teaching of English 21 145-160
[10]  
MacArthur C(2004)Asynchronous online instructional commentary: A study of student revision Readerly/Writerly Texts: Essays in Literary, Composition, and Pedagogical Theory (Double Issue) 11 & 12 47-67