An improved design for cellular manufacturing system associating scheduling decisions

被引:1
作者
R SUBHAA
N JAWAHAR
S G PONNAMBALAM
机构
[1] SSM Institute of Engineering and Technology,Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
[2] Ramco Institute of Technology,undefined
[3] Universiti Malaysia Pahang,undefined
来源
Sādhanā | 2019年 / 44卷
关键词
Simulated annealing algorithm; genetic algorithm; scheduling; cellular manufacturing system; cell formation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a model for the design of Cellular Manufacturing System (CMS) to evolve simultaneously structural design decisions of Cell Formation (CF) and operational issue decisions of optimal schedule. This integrated decision approach is important for designing a better performing cell. The model allows machine duplication and incorporates cross-flow for scheduling flexibility. The cross-flow is the term introduced to mean the inter-cell movement of parts from parent cell to identical machines in other cells though machines are available in the parent cell. This cross-flow facilitates routing flexibility and paves way for reduced schedule length thereby optimizing resources leading to minimized operational cost. A non-linear integer mathematical programming model is formulated with the objective function of minimizing operating cost which is the sum of Machine Utility Cost (MUC) and inter-cell costs. The MUC is a new cost parameter based on machine utility and it integrates CF, scheduling, and machine duplication decisions. The proposed model belongs to the class of NP-hard problems. A hybrid heuristic (HH) that has “Simulated Annealing Algorithm (SAA) embedded with Genetic Algorithm (GA)” is proposed. A comparison with the mathematical solution reveals that the proposed HH is capable of providing solutions closer to optimal in a computationally efficient manner. The model is validated by studying the effect of integrated decisions, machine duplications, and association of scheduling and cross-flow. The model validation reveals that the proposed CMS model evolves CF, scheduling, and machine duplication decisions with minimum operating cost. Thus, it can be inferred that the proposed model gives optimal integrated decisions for designing an effectively and efficiently performing cells and thus evolves improved CMS design decisions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 130 条
[1]  
Askin RG(2013)Contributions to the design and analysis of cellular manufacturing systems International Journal of Production Research 51 6778-6787
[2]  
Caux C(2000)Cell formation with alternative process plans and machine capacity constraints: A new combined approach International Journal of Production Economics 64 279-284
[3]  
Bruniaux R(2002)Grouping of parts and machines in presence of alternative process routes by genetic algorithm International Journal of Production Economics 76 219-228
[4]  
Pierreval H(2015)A capacity constrained mathematical programming model for cellular manufacturing with exceptional elements Journal of Manufacturing Systems 37 227-232
[5]  
Uddin MK(2010)The evolution of cell formation problem methodologies based on recent studies (1997–2008): Review and directions for future research European Journal of Operational Research 20 509-521
[6]  
Shanker K(2010)A cell formation problem considering machine utilization and alternative process routes by scatter search Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 23 1127-1139
[7]  
Brown JR(2014)Integration of process planning and production planning and control in cellular manufacturing Production Planning and Control: The Management of Operations 25 840-857
[8]  
Papaioannou G(2013)Neuro-genetic impact on cell formation methods of Cellular Manufacturing System design: A quantitative review and analysis Computers and Industrial Engineering 64 256-272
[9]  
Wilson JM(2013)Dynamic parts scheduling in multiple job shop cells considering intercell moves and flexible routes Computers and Operations Research 40 1207-1223
[10]  
Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R(1986)Procedures for the Part Family/Machine Group Identification Problem in Cellular Manufacturing Journal of Operations Management 6–2 125-147