AST classification of proximal humeral fractures: Introduction and interobserver reliability assessment

被引:5
作者
Cuny C. [1 ]
Baumann C. [2 ]
Mayer J. [1 ]
Guignand D. [1 ]
Irrazi M. [1 ]
Berrichi A. [1 ]
Ionescu N. [1 ]
Guillemin F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, CHR Metz Bon-Secours
[2] Department of Clinical Epidemiology, CHU Nancy, 54511 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, Rue du Morvan
关键词
Classification; Interobserver reliability; Proximal humeral fractures;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-011-0916-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This article introduces an alphanumeric AST (Articular, Surgical neck, Tuberosities) classification of proximal humeral fractures, based on the number, localization, and displacement of articular and extra-articular fragments. All possible cases of proximal humeral fractures can be assessed from a single figure using this classification. The aim of the study was thus to describe the AST classification and to assess interobserver reliability. Methods: This classification is based on a single figure, allowing an easy description of the anatomic variants of different proximal humeral fractures. The severity of the fracture is determined by the fragment displacement in angular degrees and the major linear displacement in millimeters. AST reproducibility was assessed and compared with Neer, AO, and Duparc classifications, commonly used in clinical practice. The interobserver agreement was measured with Cohen's kappa coefficients and their 95% confidence intervals. Results: Thirteen independent observers analyzed a total of 64 X-rays. Overall kappa coefficients were 0.34, 0.29, 0.24, and 0.25 for AST, Neer, AO, and Duparc classifications, respectively. Conclusion: The AST classification, which is easier to use because it is based on only one figure, is at least as reproducible as other proximal humeral fracture classifications. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 40
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Bahrs C., Schmal H., Lingenfelter E., Rolauffs B., Weise K., Dietz K., Helwig P., Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the MTM-classification for proximal humeral fractures: A prospective study, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9, (2008)
  • [2] Brorson S., Bagger J., Sylvest A., Hrobjartsson A., Neer's classification system: A critical appraisal, J Trauma, 38, pp. 257-260, (1995)
  • [3] Brorson S., Bagger J., Sylvest A., Hrobjartsson A., Improved interobserver variation after training of doctors in the Neer system. A randomised trial, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 84, pp. 950-954, (2002)
  • [4] Brorson S., Hrobjartsson A., Training improves agreement among doctors using the Neer system for proximal humeral fractures in a systematic review, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 1, pp. 7-16, (2008)
  • [5] Edelson G., Kelly I., Vigder F., Reis N.D., A three-dimensional classification for fractures of the proximal humerus, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 86, 3, pp. 413-425, (2004)
  • [6] Mahadeva D., MacKay D.C., Turner S.M., Drew S., Costa M.L., Reliability of the Neer classification system in proximal humeral fractures: A systematic review of the literature, Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 18, pp. 415-424, (2008)
  • [7] Sallay P.I., Pedowitz R.A., Mallon W.J., Vandemark R.M., Dalton J.D., Speer K.P., Reliability and reproducibility of radiographic interpretation of proximal humeral fracture pathoanatomy, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 6, 1, pp. 60-69, (1997)
  • [8] Shrader M.W., Sanchez-Sotelo J., Sperling J.W., Rowland C.M., Cofield R.H., Understanding proximal humerus fractures: Image analysis, classification, and treatment, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 14, 5, pp. 497-505, (2005)
  • [9] Siebenrock K.A., Gerber C., The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, 75, 12, pp. 1751-1755, (1993)
  • [10] Sjoden G.O.J., Movin T., Aspelin P., Guntner P., Shalabi A., 3D-radiographic analysis does not improve the Neer and AO classifications of proximal humeral fractures, Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 70, 4, pp. 325-328, (1999)