Non-linear QCD dynamics in two-photon interactions at high energies

被引:0
作者
V. P. Gonçalves
M. S. Kugeratski
E. R. Cazaroto
F. Carvalho
F. S. Navarra
机构
[1] Universidade Federal de Pelotas,Instituto de Física e Matemática
[2] Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina,Centro de Engenharia da Mobilidade
[3] Universidade de São Paulo,Instituto de Física
[4] Universidade Federal de São Paulo,Departamento de Ciências Exatas e da Terra
来源
The European Physical Journal C | 2011年 / 71卷
关键词
Light Quark Mass; BFKL Equation; HERA Data; Color Glass Condensate; Dipole Cross Section;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Perturbative QCD predicts that the growth of the gluon density at high energies should saturate, forming a Color Glass Condensate (CGC), which is described in mean field approximation by the Balitsky–Kovchegov (BK) equation. In this paper we study the γγ interactions at high energies and estimate the main observables which will be probed at future linear colliders using the color dipole picture. We discuss in detail the dipole–dipole cross section and propose a new relation between this quantity and the dipole scattering amplitude. The total γγ, γ∗γ∗ cross sections and the real photon structure function \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$F_{2}^{\gamma }(x,Q^{2})$\end{document} are calculated using the recent solution of the BK equation with running coupling constant and the predictions are compared with those obtained using phenomenological models for the dipole–dipole cross section and scattering amplitude. We demonstrate that these models are able to describe the LEP data at high energies, but predict a very different behavior for the observables at higher energies. Therefore we conclude that the study of γγ interactions can be useful to constrain the QCD dynamics.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 192 条
[1]  
Mueller A.H.(1994)undefined Nucl. Phys. B 415 373-undefined
[2]  
Mueller A.H.(1994)undefined Nucl. Phys. B 425 471-undefined
[3]  
Patel B.(1991)undefined Z. Phys. C 49 607-undefined
[4]  
Nikolaev N.N.(1992)undefined Z. Phys. C 53 331-undefined
[5]  
Zakharov B.G.(1976)undefined Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 23 338-undefined
[6]  
Nikolaev N.N.(1977)undefined J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 45 1999-undefined
[7]  
Zakharov B.G.(1978)undefined Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28 822-undefined
[8]  
Lipatov L.N.(2004)undefined Acta Phys. Pol. B 35 3069-undefined
[9]  
Kuraev E.A.(2005)undefined Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 55 461-undefined
[10]  
Lipatov L.N.(2006)undefined Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 56 104-undefined