Cortical excitability changes following grasping exercise augmented with electrical stimulation

被引:0
作者
Gergely I. Barsi
Dejan B. Popovic
Ina M. Tarkka
Thomas Sinkjær
Michael J. Grey
机构
[1] Aalborg University,Center for Sensory
[2] University of Belgrade,Motor Interaction (SMI), Department of Health Science and Technology
[3] Brain Research and Rehabilitation Center Neuron,Faculty of Electrical Engineering
[4] University of Copenhagen,Departments of Neuroscience and Pharmacology and Exercise and Sport Sciences
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2008年 / 191卷
关键词
Plasticity; Motor cortical excitability; Human; Flexor Digitorum profundus; Transcranial magnetic stimulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rehabilitation with augmented electrical stimulation can enhance functional recovery after stroke, and cortical plasticity may play a role in this process. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of three training paradigms on cortical excitability in healthy subjects. Cortical excitability was evaluated by analysing the input–output relationship between transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the flexor muscles of the fingers. The study was performed with 25 healthy volunteers who underwent 20-min simulated therapy sessions of: (1) functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the finger flexors and extensors, (2) voluntary movement (VOL) with sensory stimulation, and (3) therapeutic FES (TFES) where the electrical stimulation augmented voluntary activation. TFES training produced a significant increase in MEP magnitude throughout the stimulation range, suggesting an increase in cortical excitability. In contrast, neither the FES nor voluntary movement alone had such an effect. These results suggest that the combination of voluntary effort and FES has greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex and that TFES might be a more effective approach in rehabilitation after stroke than FES or repetitive voluntary training alone.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 164 条
  • [1] Andersen B(2003)Failure of activation of spinal motoneurons after muscle fatigue in healthy subjects studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation J Physiol 551 345-356
  • [2] Westlund B(1992)Magnetic brain stimulation: the silent period after the motor evoked potential Neurology 42 1951-1959
  • [3] Krarup C(1992)Transfer of function to a specific area of the cortex after induced recovery from brain damage Eur J Neurosci 4 853-863
  • [4] Cantello R(1999)Neuromuscular stimulation for motor relearning in hemiplegia Crit Rev Phys Med Rehabil Med 11 279-297
  • [5] Gianelli M(2000)Studies of human motor physiology with transcranial magnetic stimulation Muscle Nerve Suppl 9 26-32
  • [6] Civardi C(1998)Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice J Neurophysiol 79 1117-1123
  • [7] Mutani R(1997)Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticopinal pathway Exp Brain Res 114 329-338
  • [8] Castro-Alamancos M(1992)Motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke: a metabolic study J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 55 990-996
  • [9] Garcia-Segura L(2004)Neuroscience. Blocking plasticity in the visual cortex Science 303 1619-1621
  • [10] Borrell J(1991)Latency of motor evoked potentials to focal transcranial stimulation varies as a function of scalp position stimulated Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81 81-89