Noise reduction technology reduces radiation dose in chronic total occlusions percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score-matched analysis

被引:0
作者
Davide Maccagni
Susanna Benincasa
Barbara Bellini
Luciano Candilio
Enrico Poletti
Mauro Carlino
Antonio Colombo
Lorenzo Azzalini
机构
[1] San Raffaele Hospital,Cardio
[2] AITRI (Italian Association of Interventional Radiographers),Thoracic
[3] Hammersmith Hospital Imperial College,Vascular Department
[4] Universita’ Vita-Salute,Cardiology Department
[5] San Raffaele Scientific Institute,Interventional Cardiology
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2018年 / 34卷
关键词
Percutaneous coronary intervention; Chronic total occlusions; Radiation; Noise reduction technology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Chronic total occlusions (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with high radiation dose. Our study aim was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of a noise reduction technology (NRT) on patient radiation dose during CTO PCI. A total of 187 CTO PCIs performed between February 2016 and May 2017 were analyzed according to the angiographic systems utilized: Standard (n = 60) versus NRT (n = 127). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for differences in baseline characteristics. Primary endpoints were Cumulative Air Kerma at Interventional Reference Point (AK at IRP), which correlates with patient’s tissue reactions; and Kerma Area Product (KAP), a surrogate measure of patient’s risk of stochastic radiation effects. An Efficiency Index (defined as fluoroscopy time/AK at IRP) was calculated for each procedure. Image quality was evaluated using a 5-grade Likert-like scale. After PSM, n = 55 pairs were identified. Baseline and angiographic characteristics were well matched between groups. Compared to the Standard system, NRT was associated with lower AK at IRP [2.38 (1.80–3.66) vs. 3.24 (2.04–5.09) Gy, p = 0.035], a trend towards reduction for KAP [161 (93–244) vs. 203 (136–363) Gycm2, p = 0.069], and a better Efficiency Index [16.75 (12.73–26.27) vs. 13.58 (9.92–17.63) min/Gy, p = 0.003]. Image quality was similar between the two groups (4.39 ± 0.53 Standard vs. 4.34 ± 0.47 NRT, p = 0.571). In conclusion, compared with a Standard system, the use of NRT in CTO PCI is associated with lower patient radiation dose and similar image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1192
页数:7
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Azzalini L(2016)Epidemiology, management strategies, and outcomes of patients with chronic total coronary occlusion Am J Cardiol 118 1128-1135
  • [2] Jolicoeur EM(2015)Myths to debunk to improve management, referral, and outcomes in patients with chronic total occlusion of an epicardial coronary artery Am J Cardiol 116 1774-1780
  • [3] Pighi M(2015)Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8 245-253
  • [4] Azzalini L(2014)Initial success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in a native coronary artery is decreased in patients who underwent previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7 39-46
  • [5] Vo M(2017)Analysis of a low dose protocol to reduce patient radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary interventions Am J Cardiol 119 203-209
  • [6] Dens J(2012)Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: A cause for alarm? Report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature EuroIntervention 7 1081-1086
  • [7] Agostoni P(2009)Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: Insights from the National Research Council’s Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report Am Heart J 157 118-124
  • [8] Brilakis ES(2017)Risk of cataract among interventional cardiologists and catheterization lab staff: a systematic review and meta-analysis Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 90 1-9
  • [9] Banerjee S(2011)Skin injuries in interventional procedures Radiat Prot Dosim 147 8-12
  • [10] Karmpaliotis D(2012)The necessity of follow-up for radiation skin injuries in patients after percutaneous coronary interventions: radiation skin injuries will often be overlooked clinically Acta Radiol 53 1040-1044