The Causes and Prevention of Commercial Contract Cheating in the Era of Digital Education: A Systematic & Critical Review

被引:0
作者
Yujun Xu
Wenlong Li
机构
[1] Peking University,Graduate School of Education
[2] University of Edinburgh,Centre for Data, Culture & Society
[3] University of Birmingham,undefined
[4] University of Edinburgh,undefined
来源
Journal of Academic Ethics | 2023年 / 21卷
关键词
Commercial contract cheating; Systematic review; Critical review; Logic model; Contextual factors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides a systematic and critical review of the existing literature on the phenomenon of ‘commercial contract cheating’ (CCC). Unlike some existing systematic reviews generally on CCC, this paper focuses on the potential causes and suggested preventative measures specifically, intending to develop effective interventions on the basis of empirical insights. We reviewed primary studies with empirical data and systematic reviews focusing on higher education published between 2012 and 2020. A logic model is developed to graphically indicate the complex and dynamic interplay between a variety of factors identified. Our inquiry reveals a highly specified, uncoordinated and fragmented research landscape that urgently needs integrated, holistic and critical reflection. It shows that the current research is still far from establishing causal relationships as the scholarship opts to reveal an abundance of contextual factors identified only, without probing the relational dynamics or striving for causality. A range of broad and tentative recommendations are proposed on that basis but are barely empirically examined. We also attend to lack of conceptual clarity and work towards a more inclusive and future-proof definition of CCC beyond assignment-based conceptualisation. It is argued that CCC should never be reduced to plagiarism (a natural inclination inspired by the plagiarism research tradition) nor neutralised as a legitimate business (a potential risk revealed mostly by the supply side research). As an interdisciplinary field, CCC should move beyond student perceptions of education cheating and affordability, while including more inquiries into the exploitative, predatory nature of the industry.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 321
页数:18
相关论文
共 122 条
  • [1] Amigud A(2020)Cheaters on Twitter: An analysis of engagement approaches of contract cheating services Studies in Higher Education. 45 692-705
  • [2] Amigud A(2019)246 reasons to cheat: An analysis of students’ reasons for seeking to outsource academic work Computers & Education 134 98-107
  • [3] Lancaster T(2020)The Law and the Outlaw: Is Legal Prohibition a Viable Solution to the Contract Cheating Problem? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 98-108
  • [4] Amigud A(2011)Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews Res Synth Meth. 2 33-42
  • [5] Dawson P(1999)Internet plagiarism: Developing strategies to curb student academic dishonesty The Internet and Higher Education. 2 21-33
  • [6] Anderson LM(2020)Assignment Outsourcing: Moving beyond Contract Cheating Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 220-235
  • [7] Petticrew M(2019)Take-home exams in higher education: A systematic review Education Sciences 9 267-162
  • [8] Rehfuess E(2005)Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 137-1856
  • [9] Armstong R(2019)Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students Studies in Higher Education. 44 1837-691
  • [10] Ueffing E(2019)Contract cheating and assessment design: Exploring the relationship Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 676-139