Pharmacologic Considerations for Pediatric Sedation and Anesthesia Outside the Operating Room: A Review for Anesthesia and Non-Anesthesia Providers

被引:0
作者
Narjeet Khurmi
Perene Patel
Molly Kraus
Terrence Trentman
机构
[1] Mayo Clinic Arizona,
来源
Pediatric Drugs | 2017年 / 19卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding the pharmacologic options for pediatric sedation outside the operating room will allow practitioners to formulate an ideal anesthetic plan, allaying anxiety and achieving optimal immobilization while ensuring rapid and efficient recovery. The authors identified relevant medical literature by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for English language publications covering a period from 1984 to 2017. Search terms included pediatric anesthesia, pediatric sedation, non-operating room sedation, sedation safety, and pharmacology. As a narrative review of common sedation/anesthesia options, the authors elected to focus on studies, reviews, and case reports that show clinical relevance to modern day sedation/anesthesia practice. A variety of pharmacologic agents are available for sedation/anesthesia in pediatrics, including midazolam, fentanyl, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, etomidate, and propofol. Dosing ranges reported are a combination of what is discussed in the reviewed literature and text books along with personal recommendations based on our own practice. Several reports reveal that ketofol (a combination of ketamine and propofol) is quite popular for short, painful procedures. Fospropofol is a newer-generation propofol that may confer advantages over regular propofol. Remimazolam combines the pharmacologic effects of remifentanil and midazolam. A variety of etomidate derivatives such as methoxycarbonyl-etomidate, carboetomidate, methoxycarbonyl-carboetomidate, and cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate are in development stages. The use of nitrous oxide as a mild sedative, analgesic, and amnestic agent is gaining popularity, especially in the ambulatory setting. Utilizing a dedicated and experienced team to provide sedation enhances safety. Furthermore, limiting sedation plans to single-agent pharmacy appears to be safer than using multi-agent plans.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 446
页数:11
相关论文
共 368 条
  • [1] Gozal D(2004)A pediatric sedation/anesthesia program with dedicated care by anesthesiologists and nurses for procedures outside the operating room J Pediatr 145 47-52
  • [2] Drenger B(2014)Recent advances and contributions to procedural sedation with considerations for the future Minerva Anestesiol 80 844-855
  • [3] Levin PD(2016)A forecast of relevant pediatric sedation trends Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 29 S56-S67
  • [4] Kadari A(2006)Pediatric anesthesia in the nonoperating room setting Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19 443-449
  • [5] Gozal Y(2014)Non-invasive anesthesia for children undergoing proton radiation therapy Radiother Oncol 111 30-34
  • [6] Prescilla R(2016)Anesthesia complications of pediatric radiation therapy Pract Radiat Oncol 6 143-154
  • [7] Mason KP(1985)Midazolam: pharmacology and uses Anesthesiology 62 310-324
  • [8] Mahmoud M(2013)Benzodiazepine pharmacology and central nervous system-mediated effects Ochsner J 13 214-223
  • [9] Mason KP(2017)Sedative choice in drug-induced sleep endoscopy: a neuropharmacology-based review Laryngoscope 127 273-279
  • [10] Cravero JP(2004)Sedation and analgesia for procedures outside the operating room Semin Pediatr Surg 13 166-173