Risk factors for testicular germ cell tumours by histological tumour type

被引:0
作者
C A C Coupland
C E D Chilvers
G Davey
M C Pike
R T D Oliver
D Forman
机构
[1] School of Community Health Sciences,Division of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology
[2] University of Nottingham Medical School,Department of Preventive Medicine
[3] ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit,Department of Medical Oncology
[4] Radcliffe Infirmary,Centre for Cancer Research
[5] University of Southern California School of Medicine,undefined
[6] The Royal London Hospital,undefined
[7] University of Leeds,undefined
[8] Cookridge Hospital,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 1999年 / 80卷
关键词
case-control study; histology; risk factors; seminoma; testicular cancer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are two main histological groups of testicular germ cell tumours, which may have different risk factors. Some authors have analysed potential risk factors by histological group but few consistent differences have been identified. In this paper we examine risk factors for pure seminoma and other tumours using data from the United Kingdom case control study of testicular cancer. Seven hundred and ninety-four cases were included in the study, each with a matched control; 400 cases had pure seminoma tumours, and 394 had other testicular tumours. The risk of seminoma associated with undescended testis was slightly higher than that for other tumours (odds ratio of 5.3 compared with 3.0). When split at the median age at diagnosis, this difference was greater in men aged 32 and over (odds ratio of 11.9 compared with 5.1) than in the younger men (3.0 compared with 2.5). Risks associated with testicular or groin injuries were higher in the non-seminoma group, as was the risk for a history of sexually transmitted disease. The protective effect of a late puberty was more marked for tumours of other histologies. Some differences were also detected for participation in sports. Whilst some of the differences detected may have arisen by chance, the stronger association between undescended testis and pure seminoma has been identified by a number of other studies and may reflect a genuine difference in aetiology.
引用
收藏
页码:1859 / 1863
页数:4
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Carlsen E(1995)Declining semen quality and increasing incidence of testicular cancer: is there a common cause? Environ Health Perspect 103 137-139
[2]  
Giwercman A(1982)Sports activities and risk of testicular cancer Br J Cancer 46 749-756
[3]  
Keiding N(1995)Physical activity, medical history, and risk of testicular cancer (Alberta and British Columbia, Canada) Cancer Causes Control 6 398-406
[4]  
Skakkebaek NE(1989)The epidemiology of testicular cancer in upstate New York Am J Epidemiol 130 25-36
[5]  
Coldman AJ(1990)Occupation and risk for testicular cancer: a case-control study Int J Epidemiol 19 825-831
[6]  
Elwood JM(1979)Risk factors for cancer of the testis in young men Int J Cancer 23 598-602
[7]  
Gallagher RP(1996)Occupation and risk of germ cell testicular cancer by histologic type in Ontario J Occ Env Med 38 884-890
[8]  
Gallagher RP(1993)In situ numeric analysis of centromeric regions of chromosomes 1, 12 and 15 of seminomas, nonseminomatous germ cell tumours, and carcinoma in situ of human testis Lab Invest 68 211-219
[9]  
Huchcroft S(1993)Clues to the aetiology of testicular germ cell tumours from descriptive epidemiology Eur Urol 23 8-13
[10]  
Phillips N(1996)Risks of testicular cancer and cryptorchidism in relation to socio-economic status and related factors: case-control studies in Denmark Int J Cancer 66 287-293